J-35 vs F-35: China’s New Stealth Fighter Against the Real Thing

J-35 vs F-35: the F-35 leads on combat record, production and sensors, while China's twin-engine J-35 brings a second engine and a carrier catapult. Sourced.

Updated:

Add AeroCorner as a preferred source on Google
Shenyang J-35(A) and Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II compared side by side
Shenyang J-35(A) and Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II compared side by side – © 中国新闻社 / CC / Ronnie Macdonald / composite by AeroCorner

The F-35 is the better fighter today. It has a combat record, more than 1,355 built and sensors and networking that are proven in service, while the J-35 has no combat history and is still flying on an interim engine.

The J-35 is a serious stealth design all the same: twin-engine, built in a naval version and a land-based J-35A, and already launched from a catapult carrier. This page compares the J-35A with the F-35A.

Shenyang J-35(A)
Fighter Jets
Shenyang J-35(A)
ICAO: — Military: J-35 / J-35A Visit aircraft page
Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II
Fighter Jets
Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II
ICAO: F35 Military: F-35A Visit aircraft page

General

Units
Shenyang J-35(A)
Manufacturer
Shenyang
ICAO code
—
Military code
J-35 / J-35A
Produced
2021–Present
Price
—
Engine
2 × Guizhou WS-21 (WS-19 planned)
Engine type
Turbofan
Thrust
2 × 20,950 lbf · 93 kN -3% (total)
Avionics
AESA radar, electro-optical targeting system, distributed aperture system
Wing tips
No winglets
Seats
1
Crew
1
Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II
Manufacturer
Lockheed (Martin)
ICAO code
F35
Military code
F-35A
Produced
2006–Present
Price
$92 million (2026)
Engine
1 × Pratt & Whitney F135-PW-100
Engine type
Turbofan
Thrust
43,000 lbf · 191 kN +3% (total)
Avionics
AN/APG-81 AESA radar, AN/AAQ-40 EOTS, AN/AAQ-37 DAS, AN/ASQ-239 Barracuda EW
Wing tips
No winglets
Seats
1
Crew
1

Dimensions

Shenyang J-35(A)
Exterior length
56 ft 9 in 17.30 m 56 ft 9 in 17.30 m +10%
Tail height
15 ft 9 in 4.80 m 15 ft 9 in 4.80 m +9%
Wing span
37 ft 9 in 11.50 m 37 ft 9 in 11.50 m +8%
Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II
Exterior length
51 ft 6 in 15.70 m 51 ft 6 in 15.70 m -9%
Tail height
14 ft 5 in 4.39 m 14 ft 5 in 4.39 m -9%
Wing span
35 ft 0 in 10.67 m 35 ft 0 in 10.67 m -7%

Weights

Shenyang J-35(A)
Empty weight
— — —
Max payload
17,600 lb 8,000 kg 17,600 lb 8,000 kg -2%
Fuel capacity
2,369 gal 8,968 L 2,369 gal 8,968 L -14%
Max takeoff weight
61,500 lb 28,000 kg 61,500 lb 28,000 kg -12%
Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II
Empty weight
29,300 lb 13,290 kg 29,300 lb 13,290 kg
Max payload
18,000 lb 8,150 kg 18,000 lb 8,150 kg +2%
Fuel capacity
2,760 gal 10,448 L 2,760 gal 10,448 L +17%
Max takeoff weight
70,000 lb 31,800 kg 70,000 lb 31,800 kg +13%

Performance

Shenyang J-35(A)
Max cruise speed
1,032 kt · 1,188 mph 1,911 km/h 1,032 kt 1,188 mph 1,911 km/h -1%
Max speed
1,032 kt · 1,188 mph 1,911 km/h 1,032 kt 1,188 mph 1,911 km/h -1%
Rate of climb
— — —
Range
— — —
Service ceiling
52,493 ft 16,000 m 52,493 ft 16,000 m +5%
Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II
Max cruise speed
1,043 kt · 1,200 mph 1,932 km/h 1,043 kt 1,200 mph 1,932 km/h +1%
Max speed
1,043 kt · 1,200 mph 1,932 km/h 1,043 kt 1,200 mph 1,932 km/h +1%
Rate of climb
40,000 ft/min 203 m/s 40,000 ft/min 203 m/s
Range
1,200 nm · 1,380 mi 2,220 km 1,200 nm 1,380 mi 2,220 km
Service ceiling
50,000 ft 15,200 m 50,000 ft 15,200 m -5%

Table of Contents

MeasureF-35A Lightning IIShenyang J-35A
LayoutSingle engine, one airframe in three variantsTwin engine, naval J-35 and land-based J-35A
OriginJoint Strike Fighter program, first built in 2006Private FC-31 venture, first flown in 2012
Internal missiles4 (6 with Sidekick, Block 4)Up to 6 reported (PL-15E, PL-10)
Internal gun25 mm GAU-22/A, 180 roundsNone confirmed
RadarAN/APG-81, in serviceNot disclosed
Flyaway cost, latest lot$92.0 million (Lots 18-19)Not published
Production1,355+ delivered (Sept 2026)57+ estimated (Oct 2025)
Operators20+ countriesChina only; no export delivered
Combat useYes, since 2018None
Judgment and program measures only. The full side-by-side specification table is above. Sources: USAF, Lockheed Martin, Wikipedia, The Diplomat.

How to read this comparison

Every F-35 figure here is official. Nearly every J-35 figure is an estimate built from photographs and state media, because China publishes very little. Neither jet has fought the other. The spec panel above compares the F-35A, the Air Force version, with the land-based J-35A.

Is the J-35 a copy of the F-35?

The resemblance is real. Both are medium-sized fifth-generation fighters with canted twin tails and side-mounted inlets, and Chinese cyberespionage against the F-35 program is documented.

But the J-35 is a different aircraft. It has two engines where the F-35 has one, and it began life as the privately funded FC-31, which first flew in October 2012, before the F-35 was in service.

Analysts note that the twin-engine KF-21 and India’s AMCA converged on a similar layout without any theft, because similar requirements push designers toward similar answers. Stolen data is considered more likely to have helped with subsystems than with the airframe.

Two different programs

The F-35 Lightning II is one design in three versions from one production line: conventional, short takeoff and carrier. Lockheed Martin had delivered more than 1,355 by September 2026.

The Shenyang J-35 split in two. The naval J-35 has a catapult launch bar, a tailhook, folding wings and a larger wing area. The J-35A drops all of that, with a smaller wing and single-wheel nose gear.

Engines: the J-35’s open question

The F-35A has one Pratt & Whitney F135 making 43,000 lb of thrust. The J-35 has two engines, and that is its most visible difference.

Production J-35s are generally assessed to fly on the Chinese WS-21, at 87.2 to 93 kN per engine. The intended engine is the WS-19, rated at 116 kN, which is expected to allow supercruise.

As of September 2026 there is no official statement that production aircraft use the WS-19. In February 2026 Defence Blog relayed one Chinese commentator’s claim that a J-35 on the current engine can loiter only about seven minutes at 560 miles (900 km) from its carrier. That is one assessment, not a released figure.

Edge: F-35, because its engine is the one it was designed around.

Stealth and sensors

Aviation Week has reported the F-35’s radar cross-section at about 0.001 square meters, roughly the return of a golf ball. That figure is an analogy from an interested party.

China’s state broadcaster CCTV said in September 2025 that the J-35 series has a radar cross-section smaller than a human palm. That is also a claim from the manufacturer’s own side, and no independent measurement exists for either jet.

The J-35 has the standard stealth features: edge alignment, chines, serrated panel edges, diverterless inlets and serrated nozzles. The radar advertised for the FC-31 was the KLJ-7A, reportedly comparable to the F-35’s APG-81, but what production aircraft carry has not been disclosed.

The sensor layout is known: a chin-mounted electro-optical turret and optical apertures around the airframe. The F-35 has the same idea, proven in service since 2018, with every jet sharing one fused picture.

Edge: F-35, on what can be verified.

Myth: the J-35 is stealthier than the F-35

Chinese media have claimed the J-35 beats the F-35 on radar signature. The claim rests on a state broadcaster’s statement, with no measurement behind it. Neither government releases the data that would settle it, so no ranking of the two on stealth is supported.

Weapons

The F-35A has four internal stations. In an air-to-air setup that usually means four AIM-120s, and the Sidekick rack offered with Block 4 raises it to six.

The J-35 is credited with six internal hardpoints. The PL-15E with folding fins shown at Zhuhai in 2024 lets six fit in a bay that previously held four, and designers told CCTV in 2025 that the carrier jet carries up to six missiles.

The F-35A carries a 25 mm GAU-22/A cannon with 180 rounds. No gun has been confirmed on either J-35 variant.

Edge: even, with the F-35 ahead on proven weapons integration.

Speed and range

The J-35’s published limit is Mach 1.8 at altitude, about 1,188 mph (1,911 km/h). The Air Force lists the F-35A at Mach 1.6, about 1,200 mph. The two are close.

Figures near 2,200 km/h for the J-35 come from applying a high-altitude Mach limit at sea-level conditions. The same source gives a sea-level maximum of Mach 1.14.

No range has been published for the J-35, only a combat radius of roughly 780 miles (1,250 km) on internal fuel. The F-35A’s published range is 1,380 miles. A radius is not a range, so the two cannot be compared directly.

Edge: F-35, on published figures.

Carrier operations

The J-35 is the first Chinese stealth fighter flown from an electromagnetic catapult. On 22 September 2025 state media showed J-35, J-15T and KJ-600 aircraft launching from the carrier Fujian, commissioned on 5 November 2025.

The claim that this was a world first does not hold. F-35Cs of the Navy’s VX-23 flew catapult launches and arrested landings aboard USS Gerald R. Ford in 2022.

The F-35C is in squadron service. As of September 2026 no carrier strike group deployment with an embarked J-35 squadron has been documented.

Edge: F-35, though the J-35 is learning the job fast.

Numbers, cost and exports

The F-35A costs $92.0 million per aircraft in Lots 18 and 19. China has not published a J-35 price.

The most-quoted J-35 count is more than 57 aircraft as of October 2025, read from serial numbers on state television footage. It is an inference, not an official figure.

The J-35AE, an export version of the J-35A, was unveiled on 1 May 2026. Pakistan is the customer everyone names, but its defense minister dismissed sale reports in June 2025. The Diplomat concluded in July 2026 that China is not selling the J-35A to Pakistan yet.

Edge: F-35 by a wide margin.

J-35 vs F-35 vs J-20 and F-22

The J-35 is China’s second stealth fighter after the J-20, which is larger, longer-ranged and built for a different job. Our F-35 vs J-20 comparison covers that matchup.

The F-22 is the F-35’s air-superiority stablemate. See our US vs China fighter jets comparison for the wider picture, and our list of the best Chinese fighter jets.

The verdict

The F-35 is the better fighter today. It has a combat record, a mature production line, proven sensors and a catapult carrier version already in service.

The J-35 is the more interesting question for the future. Its gaps are an interim engine, a production rate still ramping and an air wing still qualifying, not aerodynamics. If the WS-19 arrives and numbers grow, the comparison tightens.

Both appear in our ranking of the best fighter jets in the world.

FAQ

Not on the evidence available. The F-35 has a combat record, more than 1,355 aircraft delivered by September 2026 and proven sensors. The J-35 has no combat history and is assessed to fly on an interim engine. Stealth comparisons rest on claims from both sides, not measurements.
It is not a copy, though the resemblance is genuine and Chinese cyberespionage against the F-35 program is documented. The J-35 has two engines, and analysts note the KF-21 and AMCA reached similar layouts independently.
The most-quoted figure is more than 57 as of October 2025, derived from serial numbers on state television footage. It is not an official count.
Nobody outside the two governments can say. CCTV claimed a radar cross-section smaller than a human palm, while the F-35’s has been reported around 0.001 square meters. Both are analogies from interested parties.
The published maximum is Mach 1.8 at altitude, about 1,188 mph (1,911 km/h). The F-35A is listed at Mach 1.6, about 1,200 mph.
Not as of September 2026. The export J-35AE was unveiled on 1 May 2026, but no contract has been confirmed by either government and no aircraft has been delivered.
Yes. The naval J-35 launched from the electromagnetic catapults of the carrier Fujian, shown on 22 September 2025. The Fujian was commissioned on 5 November 2025.

About the Author

Tim de Vries

Tim is the owner and lead editor of AeroCorner since 2019, overseeing aviation content covering aircraft, airlines, airports, and the broader aviation industry. Through years of researching, writing, editing, and publishing aviation-focused content, he has developed extensive practical knowledge of commercial aviation and air travel. Based in Asia and a frequent traveler himself, Tim also brings firsthand passenger experience to AeroCorner’s coverage. Outside of publishing, he has also explored aviation firsthand through hands-on flight training in New Zealand.