Su-27 vs F-16: The Heavyweight Flanker Against the Lightweight Viper, and Who Wins

Su-27 vs F-16 compared on size, range, radar, agility and combat. The Flanker was built to fight the F-15, so this is a heavyweight against a lightweight.

Updated: by Tim de Vries

Add AeroCorner as a preferred source on Google
Sukhoi Su-27 "Flanker" and Lockheed Martin F-16 Fighting Falcon compared side by side
Sukhoi Su-27 “Flanker” and Lockheed Martin F-16 Fighting Falcon compared side by side – © Dmitriy Pichugin / public domain / composite by AeroCorner

The Su-27 and the F-16 were never meant to fight each other. The Su-27 is a heavy, long-range air-superiority fighter built to match the F-15 Eagle. The F-16 is a lightweight single-engine fighter, and its Soviet counterpart was the MiG-29.

Jet for jet, the Su-27 is the stronger pure air-to-air platform, with three times the internal fuel and more reach. The F-16 carries more bombs, was built in far greater numbers, and its current versions fly with much newer radar.

Sukhoi Su-27 “Flanker”
Fighter Jets
Sukhoi Su-27 “Flanker”
ICAO: SU27 Military: Su-27S Visit aircraft page
Lockheed Martin F-16 Fighting Falcon
Fighter Jets
Lockheed Martin F-16 Fighting Falcon
ICAO: F16 Military: F-16C Visit aircraft page

General

Units
Sukhoi Su-27 “Flanker”
Manufacturer
Sukhoi
ICAO code
SU27
Military code
Su-27S
Produced
1982–2010
Price
$37 million (1900)
Engine
2 × Saturn (Lyulka) AL-31F afterburning turbofans
Engine type
Turbofan
Thrust
2 × 27,560 lbf · 123 kN +89% (total)
Avionics
Phazotron N001 Myech pulse-Doppler radar, OLS-27 infrared search and track, SPO-15 Beryoza radar warning receiver
Wing tips
No winglets
Seats
1 economy · 1 business
Crew
1
Lockheed Martin F-16 Fighting Falcon
Manufacturer
Lockheed Martin
ICAO code
F16
Military code
F-16C
Produced
1973–Present
Price
$18.8 million (1998)
Engine
1 × Pratt & Whitney F100-PW-229
Engine type
Turbofan
Thrust
29,160 lbf · 130 kN -47% (total)
Avionics
AN/APG-68 pulse-Doppler radar (AN/APG-83 SABR AESA on modernized and Block 70/72 jets), wide-angle head-up display, Link 16, helmet-mounted integrated targeting, Automatic Ground Collision Avoidance System
Wing tips
No winglets
Seats
1
Crew
1

Dimensions

Sukhoi Su-27 “Flanker”
Exterior length
71 ft 10 in 21.90 m 71 ft 10 in 21.90 m +45%
Tail height
19 ft 5 in 5.92 m 19 ft 5 in 5.92 m +21%
Wing span
48 ft 3 in 14.70 m 48 ft 3 in 14.70 m +48%
Lockheed Martin F-16 Fighting Falcon
Exterior length
49 ft 5 in 15.06 m 49 ft 5 in 15.06 m -31%
Tail height
16 ft 0 in 4.88 m 16 ft 0 in 4.88 m -18%
Wing span
32 ft 8 in 9.96 m 32 ft 8 in 9.96 m -32%

Weights

Sukhoi Su-27 “Flanker”
Empty weight
36,112 lb 16,380 kg 36,112 lb 16,380 kg +91%
Max payload
9,750 lb 4,450 kg 9,750 lb 4,450 kg -43%
Fuel capacity
3,163 gal 11,973 L 3,163 gal 11,973 L +203%
Max takeoff weight
67,000 lb 30,500 kg 67,000 lb 30,500 kg +59%
Max landing weight
46,300 lb 21,000 kg 46,300 lb 21,000 kg
Lockheed Martin F-16 Fighting Falcon
Empty weight
18,900 lb 8,573 kg 18,900 lb 8,573 kg -48%
Max payload
17,000 lb 7,700 kg 17,000 lb 7,700 kg +74%
Fuel capacity
1,045 gal 3,956 L 1,045 gal 3,956 L -67%
Max takeoff weight
42,300 lb 19,200 kg 42,300 lb 19,200 kg -37%
Max landing weight
— — —

Performance

Sukhoi Su-27 “Flanker”
Max cruise speed
1,350 kt · 1,554 mph 2,500 km/h 1,350 kt 1,554 mph 2,500 km/h +15%
Max speed
1,350 kt · 1,554 mph 2,500 km/h 1,350 kt 1,554 mph 2,500 km/h +15%
Cruise speed
— — —
Approach speed
129 kt · 148 mph 239 km/h 129 kt 148 mph 239 km/h
Rate of climb
59,000 ft/min 300 m/s 59,000 ft/min 300 m/s +18%
Range
1,906 nm · 2,190 mi 3,530 km 1,906 nm 2,190 mi 3,530 km -16%
Service ceiling
60,700 ft 18,500 m 60,700 ft 18,500 m +21%
Takeoff distance
2,150 ft 650 m 2,150 ft 650 m +88%
Landing distance
2,050 ft 620 m 2,050 ft 620 m +36%
Lockheed Martin F-16 Fighting Falcon
Max cruise speed
1,176 kt · 1,353 mph 2,178 km/h 1,176 kt 1,353 mph 2,178 km/h -13%
Max speed
1,176 kt · 1,353 mph 2,178 km/h 1,176 kt 1,353 mph 2,178 km/h -13%
Cruise speed
504 kt · 580 mph 933 km/h 504 kt 580 mph 933 km/h
Approach speed
— — —
Rate of climb
50,000 ft/min 254 m/s 50,000 ft/min 254 m/s -15%
Range
2,277 nm · 2,620 mi 4,220 km 2,277 nm 2,620 mi 4,220 km +19%
Service ceiling
50,000 ft 15,200 m 50,000 ft 15,200 m -18%
Takeoff distance
1,130 ft 350 m 1,130 ft 350 m -47%
Landing distance
1,500 ft 460 m 1,500 ft 460 m -26%

Table of Contents

Judgment callSukhoi Su-27 FlankerF-16 Fighting Falcon
Built to beA heavy, long-range air-superiority fighterA lightweight fighter; now a multirole workhorse
ProgramThe heavy (TPFI) half of the Soviet PFI requirementUSAF Lightweight Fighter program, the low end of a high/low mix with the F-15
Like-for-like rivalF-15 EagleMiG-29
First flight20 May 1977 (T-10 prototype)2 February 1974 (YF-16, official first flight)
Service entry1985Introduced August 1978
RadarN001 pulse-Doppler on the baseline jetAPG-68; APG-83 AESA on the F-16V and upgraded jets
Gun30 mm GSh-30-1, 150 rounds20 mm M61A1, 500 rounds
Hardpoints10 external pylons11 stations, 2 of them for sensor pods
Thrust-to-weight1.07 with 56% internal fuel1.24 at loaded weight with 50% internal fuel
Number built6804,604, still in production
Air-to-air recordTwo Eritrean MiG-29s downed by Ethiopia, 199944 kills in the 1982 Lebanon war alone
Flies for UkraineYesYes, since 2024
Thrust-to-weight figures are published ratios at slightly different fuel states. Dimensions, weights, speeds and engine data are in the database comparison above. Current as of September 2026.

The Su-27’s real rival was the F-15, not the F-16

In 1969 the Soviet Union learned of the U.S. Air Force’s F-X program, which became the F-15 Eagle. Moscow answered with a requirement for a new frontline fighter, known as PFI.

One aircraft could not meet that specification in the numbers needed at an affordable price, so it was split in two. The lightweight half produced the MiG-29. The heavy half went to Sukhoi and produced the Su-27.

The Americans had made the same split a few years earlier. The Air Force could not afford enough F-15s for every mission, so the Lightweight Fighter program produced the F-16 as the cheaper half of a high/low mix.

So Su-27 vs F-16 is a heavyweight against a lightweight. The like-for-like pairings are Su-27 vs F-15 and MiG-29 vs F-16, and our F-16 vs F-15 comparison shows how differently the two American halves turned out.

Su-27 vs F-16 size comparison

Side by side, the gap is obvious. The Su-27 is 71 ft 10 in (21.90 m) long with a 48 ft 3 in (14.70 m) wingspan. The F-16 is 49 ft 5 in (15.06 m) long with a 32 ft 8 in (9.96 m) span.

Empty, the Su-27 weighs 36,112 lb (16,380 kg), nearly twice the F-16’s 18,900 lb (8,573 kg). Maximum takeoff weight is 67,000 lb (30,500 kg) against 42,300 lb (19,200 kg).

The Su-27 has two engines in separate nacelles with a tunnel between them. The F-16 has one.

Where the Su-27 wins

Fuel and reach. The Su-27 holds 3,150 gal of fuel internally, against 1,050 gal for the F-16. That factor of three is the whole point of a heavy fighter: it can fly further, loiter longer and fight further from home without tanks.

The range figures in the database above need a warning. They list 2,190 mi for the Su-27 and 2,620 mi for the F-16, but they measure different things.

The F-16 number is ferry range with three drop tanks. The Su-27 number is on internal fuel at cruising altitude. Compared on internal fuel alone, the Su-27 is the longer-legged jet by a wide margin.

Top speed. The Su-27 is rated at Mach 2.35 at altitude, 1,554 mph. The F-16C is rated at Mach 2.05 clean at 40,000 feet, 1,353 mph.

Sensors for air combat. Besides its N001 radar, with look-down/shoot-down capability, the Su-27 carries an OLS-27 infrared search and track sensor in front of the cockpit. It is credited with 50 to 62 miles (80 to 100 km) of range and lets the pilot hunt a target by its heat.

Low-speed handling. The Su-27 had the Soviet Union’s first operational fly-by-wire flight controls. Its big wing gives a loading of about 77 lb/sq ft with 56% fuel, against 88.3 lb/sq ft for the F-16C, and a lower figure generally means a tighter instantaneous turn.

Test pilot Viktor Pugachev first demonstrated the Cobra maneuver in a Su-27 in 1989, briefly holding level flight at about 120 degrees angle of attack.

The Streak Flanker

A stripped Su-27 prototype called the P-42, with no radar, weapons or paint, took several time-to-climb world records from the F-15 Streak Eagle between 1986 and 1988. Several of those records still stood as of 2019.

Where the F-16 wins

Thrust for its weight. At a typical loaded weight with half its internal fuel, the F-16 has a thrust-to-weight ratio of 1.24. The Su-27’s published figure is 1.07 with 56% fuel.

More spare thrust means the F-16 bleeds less energy in a sustained turn and climbs back faster after one. Both jets are rated to 9 g, but the F-16 was the first fighter purpose-built to pull it.

The cockpit. The F-16 was the first production fighter built around relaxed static stability and fly-by-wire controls. Its pilot flies with a side-stick under a frameless bubble canopy that gives a 360-degree view.

Bombs as well as missiles. The F-16 is rated to carry 17,000 lb (7,700 kg) of stores, against 9,750 lb (4,450 kg) for the Su-27. It is why a jet conceived as a lightweight day fighter ended up flying strike missions for air forces around the world.

Modern sensors. The F-16V and upgraded American and Taiwanese jets carry the AN/APG-83 SABR, an active electronically scanned array radar. That is a generation newer than the baseline Su-27’s N001, and it pairs with the AIM-120 AMRAAM, which recent F-16 versions carry.

Numbers. Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics built 4,604 F-16s, and about 2,102 were still in service in 2026, some 15% of all active combat aircraft in the world. New ones have been rolling off a line in Greenville, South Carolina, since 2023. Sukhoi built 680 Su-27s.

Russia has modernized its own Flankers, and a squadron of upgraded Su-27SM3s deployed to Syria in 2015. The airframe also grew into the Su-30 and Su-35, which our Su-27 vs Su-35 comparison covers.

Who would win in a dogfight?

It depends on which versions meet and where the fight starts. No public test result settles it, so any answer is a judgment from published figures.

Close in, it is roughly even on paper. The Su-27 has the lower wing loading and remarkable high-angle-of-attack handling. The F-16 has more thrust for its weight and superb visibility. Pilot training would decide it more than either airframe.

Beyond visual range, the matchup tilts toward whichever jet has the newer radar and missiles. A current F-16 with an AESA radar and AMRAAMs has the edge over a baseline 1980s Su-27; a modernized Su-27 narrows that gap and keeps its advantage in fuel.

Three Su-27 vs F-16 myths

The F-16 has one engine, not two. Neither jet has folding or swinging wings; the Su-27 has a fixed, clipped wing. And the F-16 is not the newer design: it first flew in 1974, three years before the Su-27 prototype.

The Su-27 and the F-16 have met, and now fly on the same side

The best-known encounter came over the Baltic Sea on 21 June 2017. A Polish Air Force F-16 Block 52+ on NATO air policing approached the Tu-154 carrying Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu to Kaliningrad.

One of the escorting Su-27s maneuvered toward the F-16 and forced it to move away. A few minutes later the F-16 left the area.

Today the two types fight together. Ukraine went into the Russian invasion with Su-27s and had lost 19 of them by 21 April 2026.

European air forces, led by Denmark and the Netherlands, donated F-16s. The first arrived by the end of July 2024, and President Zelensky announced them in service on 4 August 2024.

Three air forces fly both

Of the Su-27’s current operators, three also fly the F-16. Ukraine is one. Indonesia bought two Su-27SKs in 2003 and three Su-27SKMs in 2010, alongside its F-16s. And the U.S. Air Force took delivery of two Su-27Ps from Belarus in 1995 and bought two Su-27UBs in 2011 for evaluation and training.

By the end of July 2026 Ukraine had confirmed the loss of five F-16s and three pilots. In July 2026 General Dan Caine, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs, told a Senate committee that a Ukrainian F-16 had shot down a Russian fighter for the first time.

Caine did not name the type. Ukrainian sources say it was a Su-35S lost on 8 July 2026, a descendant of the Su-27, which would make the F-16’s first fighter kill over Ukraine a Flanker.

Verdict: which is better?

For pure air superiority over long distances, the Su-27. It is bigger, carries three times the fuel, is faster on paper and handles superbly at low speed.

For almost everything else, the F-16. It carries more ordnance, it was built in nearly seven times the numbers, it is still in production, and its current versions have the more modern radar.

Both families are still flying combat missions nearly half a century after their first flights. For how they rank against the wider field, see our list of the best fighter jets in the world.

FAQ

As a pure air-superiority fighter, yes: the Su-27 is larger, carries three times the internal fuel and is faster on paper. The F-16 is the better all-rounder. It carries more ordnance, was built in far greater numbers, is still in production, and its current versions fly with an AESA radar a generation newer than the baseline Su-27’s.
The Su-27, by a wide margin. It is 71 ft 10 in long with a 48 ft 3 in wingspan, against 49 ft 5 in and 32 ft 8 in for the F-16. Empty, the Su-27 weighs 36,112 lb, nearly twice the F-16’s 18,900 lb, and it has two engines to the F-16’s one.
There is no clear winner on paper. The Su-27 has lower wing loading and exceptional high-angle-of-attack handling, while the F-16 has more thrust for its weight at half fuel and better visibility. At longer range, the jet with the newer radar and missiles has the edge, which favors a current F-16 over a baseline Su-27.
The F-15 Eagle. The Su-27 came from the heavy half of the Soviet PFI fighter requirement, which was written after Moscow learned of the program that produced the F-15. The F-16’s Soviet counterpart is the MiG-29, which came from the lightweight half.
The Su-27, on paper. It is rated at Mach 2.35 at altitude, 1,554 mph, while the F-16C is rated at Mach 2.05 clean at 40,000 feet, 1,353 mph.
One apparently has. In July 2026 General Dan Caine told a Senate committee that a Ukrainian F-16 had shot down a Russian fighter for the first time. He did not name the type, but Ukrainian sources say it was a Su-35S lost on 8 July 2026.
Yes. Ukraine has flown the Su-27 throughout the Russian invasion and received its first F-16s, donated by European air forces, by the end of July 2024. Indonesia and the U.S. Air Force also operate both types.

About the Author

Tim de Vries

Tim is the owner and lead editor of AeroCorner since 2019, overseeing aviation content covering aircraft, airlines, airports, and the broader aviation industry. Through years of researching, writing, editing, and publishing aviation-focused content, he has developed extensive practical knowledge of commercial aviation and air travel. Based in Asia and a frequent traveler himself, Tim also brings firsthand passenger experience to AeroCorner’s coverage. Outside of publishing, he has also explored aviation firsthand through hands-on flight training in New Zealand.