P-51 Mustang vs F4U Corsair: Which Was the Better Fighter?

P-51 Mustang vs F4U Corsair compared on speed, range, firepower and carrier use, plus the 1969 air combat in which a Corsair shot down a Mustang.

Updated: by Tim de Vries

Add AeroCorner as a preferred source on Google
North American P-51 Mustang and Vought F4U Corsair compared side by side
North American P-51 Mustang and Vought F4U Corsair compared side by side – © Robert Sullivan / Eric Denison / composite by AeroCorner

The F4U Corsair is slightly faster and climbs quicker, while the P-51 Mustang flies much farther. That is the whole comparison in one line: the Mustang was the better long-range bomber escort, and the Corsair was the heavier-hitting fighter-bomber.

They even met in combat. In 1969 a Honduran Corsair shot down a Salvadoran Mustang in what is called the last dogfight between piston-engine fighters.

North American P-51 Mustang
Military Propellor Planes
North American P-51 Mustang
ICAO: P51 Military: P-51D Visit aircraft page
Vought F4U Corsair
Military Propellor Planes
Vought F4U Corsair
ICAO: F4U Military: F4U-4 Visit aircraft page

General

Units
North American P-51 Mustang
Manufacturer
North American Aviation (NAA)
ICAO code
P51
Military code
P-51D
Produced
1940–1945
Price
$590,000 (2019)
Engine
1 × Packard (Rolls Royce) V-1650-7 Merlin
Engine type
Piston
Power
1,720 hp · 1,283 kW -18% (total)
Wing tips
No winglets
Seats
1
Crew
1
Vought F4U Corsair
Manufacturer
Vought
ICAO code
F4U
Military code
F4U-4
Produced
1942–1953
Price
—
Engine
1 × Pratt & Whitney R-2800-18W Double Wasp
Engine type
Piston
Power
2,100 hp · 1,566 kW +22% (total)
Wing tips
No winglets
Seats
1
Crew
1

Dimensions

North American P-51 Mustang
Exterior length
32 ft 3 in 9.83 m 32 ft 3 in 9.83 m -4%
Tail height
13 ft 5 in 4.08 m 13 ft 5 in 4.08 m -9%
Fuselage diameter
2 ft 11 in 0.90 m 2 ft 11 in 0.90 m -31%
Wing span
37 ft 0 in 11.28 m 37 ft 0 in 11.28 m -10%
Vought F4U Corsair
Exterior length
33 ft 8 in 10.26 m 33 ft 8 in 10.26 m +4%
Tail height
14 ft 9 in 4.50 m 14 ft 9 in 4.50 m +10%
Fuselage diameter
4 ft 3 in 1.30 m 4 ft 3 in 1.30 m +44%
Wing span
41 ft 0 in 12.50 m 41 ft 0 in 12.50 m +11%

Weights

North American P-51 Mustang
Empty weight
7,635 lb 3,463 kg 7,635 lb 3,463 kg -17%
Max payload
— — —
Fuel capacity
269 gal 1,018 L 269 gal 1,018 L -50%
Max takeoff weight
12,100 lb 5,500 kg 12,100 lb 5,500 kg -17%
Vought F4U Corsair
Empty weight
9,205 lb 4,175 kg 9,205 lb 4,175 kg +21%
Max payload
4,000 lb 1,800 kg 4,000 lb 1,800 kg
Fuel capacity
534 gal 2,021 L 534 gal 2,021 L +99%
Max takeoff weight
14,700 lb 6,650 kg 14,700 lb 6,650 kg +21%

Performance

North American P-51 Mustang
Max cruise speed
383 kt · 441 mph 709 km/h 383 kt 441 mph 709 km/h -1%
Max speed
383 kt · 441 mph 709 km/h 383 kt 441 mph 709 km/h -1%
Cruise speed
315 kt · 362 mph 583 km/h 315 kt 362 mph 583 km/h +68%
Rate of climb
3,200 ft/min 16 m/s 3,200 ft/min 16 m/s -27%
Range
1,434 nm · 1,650 mi 2,660 km 1,434 nm 1,650 mi 2,660 km +64%
Service ceiling
41,900 ft 12,800 m 41,900 ft 12,800 m +1%
Vought F4U Corsair
Max cruise speed
388 kt · 447 mph 719 km/h 388 kt 447 mph 719 km/h +1%
Max speed
388 kt · 447 mph 719 km/h 388 kt 447 mph 719 km/h +1%
Cruise speed
187 kt · 215 mph 346 km/h 187 kt 215 mph 346 km/h -41%
Rate of climb
4,360 ft/min 22 m/s 4,360 ft/min 22 m/s +36%
Range
873 nm · 1,000 mi 1,620 km 873 nm 1,000 mi 1,620 km -39%
Service ceiling
41,500 ft 12,600 m 41,500 ft 12,600 m -1%

Table of Contents

QuestionP-51 MustangF4U Corsair
Main roleLong-range bomber escort and fighter-bomberCarrier and land-based fighter-bomber
MakerNorth American AviationVought (also built by Goodyear and Brewster)
First flightOctober 26, 1940 (NA-73X)May 29, 1940 (XF4U-1)
Total built15,68612,571 in 16 models
Signature theaterBomber escort over Germany, 1944 to 1945Pacific land bases from 1943, then Korea
Gun armament, late modelsSix .50 caliber machine guns (P-51D)Six .50 caliber machine guns, or four 20 mm cannon (F4U-4B)
Heaviest bomb loadOne bomb of up to 500 lb under each wingUp to 4,000 lb (Vought, F4U-4)
Built for carrier decksNoYes
Last combat1969, Football War (El Salvador)1969, Football War (Honduras and El Salvador)
Sources: Wikipedia (P-51 and F4U articles), Vought Aircraft Heritage, AeroCorner aircraft database. Speed, range and weights are in the spec table above.

P-51 Mustang vs F4U Corsair: how they began

The Corsair flew first. The XF4U-1 prototype took off on May 29, 1940, five months before the Mustang’s NA-73X flew on October 26, 1940. Vought was building a carrier fighter around the largest engine available, while North American was answering a British request for fighters.

The British Purchasing Commission had asked North American to build Curtiss P-40s under license. North American offered a new design instead, and its prototype was ready 102 days after the contract was signed. The Mustang entered Royal Air Force service in January 1942, and the Navy took its first production Corsair on July 31, 1942.

The early Mustang used an Allison V-1710 engine without a high-altitude supercharger, so its performance fell off above about 15,000 ft. In mid-1942 a Rolls-Royce Merlin with a two-stage supercharger fixed that, and the Merlin-powered P-51B and P-51C became the fighter people remember.

Speed and horsepower

On the numbers in the spec table above, the two are close. The F4U-4 tops out at 388 kt, or 447 mph (719 km/h), while the P-51 manages 383 kt, or 441 mph (709 km/h). The Corsair also climbs faster at 4,360 ft/min against the Mustang’s 3,200 ft/min.

The Corsair’s engine is the bigger one. The F4U-4’s Pratt & Whitney R-2800-18W is rated at 2,100 hp (1,566 kW), and water injection could raise that to 2,450 hp for short bursts.

The P-51D’s Packard-built Merlin V-1650-7 is a smaller, liquid-cooled V12, and its horsepower figure differs by source: Wikipedia’s P-51D block lists 1,490 hp at 3,000 rpm, while the spec table above lists 1,720 hp.

Both aircraft reach almost the same ceiling, 41,500 ft (12,600 m) for the Corsair and 41,900 ft (12,800 m) for the Mustang. Published speeds depend on altitude and engine setting, so a few mph either way proves little. On paper the Corsair is a hair faster. In practice both were among the fastest piston fighters of the war.

Range: where the Mustang wins

Range is the real separator. The P-51 could fly 1,650 mi with external tanks, against about 1,000 mi for the Corsair on the spec table above. That gap is why the Mustang ended up escorting bombers all the way to Berlin.

A 1943 USAAF report called the P-51B the most promising escort, with an endurance of 4 hours 45 minutes on its internal fuel plus 150 US gallons carried externally.

By the end of 1944, 14 of the Eighth Air Force’s 15 fighter groups flew Mustangs. Reichsmarschall Hermann Göring was quoted as saying, “When I saw Mustangs over Berlin, I knew the jig was up.”

The F4U-4 gave range away. Its unarmored 62-gallon wing fuel tanks were removed to improve handling, which cut its maximum range. Vought’s published fuel figure counts two 150-gallon drop tanks, so the Corsair’s internal fuel was far lower than the number suggests.

Firepower and bomb load

Both fighters carried six .50 caliber Browning machine guns in the late-war versions. The F4U-4B swapped them for four 20 mm cannon, and Vought lists eight 5 inch rockets under the Corsair’s wings. The P-51D could carry six or ten 5 inch rockets on later production blocks.

The Corsair was the heavier striker. Vought lists up to 4,000 lb of bombs for the F4U-4, against a single bomb of 100, 250 or 500 lb under each wing on the P-51D. That made the Corsair a true fighter-bomber, and it carried 70% of all bombs dropped by U.S. fighters during the war.

One correction to a common claim: the F4U-4B’s cannon were AN/M3 weapons, not the M61 Vulcan that some sources wrongly credit it with.

Carrier landings, handling and survivability

The Corsair was designed for carrier decks, and carriers were its hardest test. Its left wing could stall suddenly in a slow approach, its long nose hid the deck, and its oleo struts bounced. Fixes followed, and most early Corsairs went to Marine squadrons on land bases. Only 15% of the type’s wartime sorties launched from carriers.

The Mustang had a different weakness. Its liquid-cooled Merlin relied on a coolant radiator under the fuselage, and Wikipedia notes that radiator and coolant lines were vulnerable to small-arms fire on strafing runs. The Corsair’s engine is an air-cooled radial, the type that Wikipedia says usually let the Republic P-47 Thunderbolt shrug off small-arms fire.

Combat records

By May 8, 1945, P-51 groups of the Eighth, Ninth and Fifteenth Air Forces had claimed about 4,950 aircraft shot down, roughly half of all USAAF claims in Europe, and 4,131 destroyed on the ground. Their losses were about 2,520 aircraft. These are claims, not confirmed kills.

U.S. figures list 64,051 operational sorties for Navy and Marine Corsairs, with pilots claiming 2,140 air victories against 189 losses to enemy aircraft.

Wikipedia notes the favorable ratio owed partly to circumstances, because Corsairs moved to ground attack as the Pacific war shifted north. The Corsair also outclimbed and outdove the A6M Zero, though the Zero could turn tighter at low speed.

Both types went on to Korea. The Mustang, redesignated F-51, was the main U.S. fighter at the start of the war until jets took over. The Corsair flew mostly close support, and F4U-5N night fighters hunted supply convoys.

The last piston-engine dogfight: Corsair vs Mustang

The two met in real combat on July 17, 1969, during the Football War between Honduras and El Salvador. Honduran Captain Fernando Soto shot down three Salvadoran aircraft that day, and one of them was a Cavalier Mustang, a rebuilt P-51 variant.

Wikipedia describes that combat as the last aerial combat between piston-engined fighters in the world. The Corsair won it. El Salvador flew Mustangs and Corsairs in the same war, and the two other aircraft Soto shot down that afternoon were FG-1 Corsairs.

Which was better: the P-51 or the F4U Corsair?

For range and bomber escort, the P-51 Mustang. Nothing else the Allies had could fly a heavy-bomber raid into Germany and still fight at the end. For ground attack, heavier bomb loads and carrier operations, the F4U Corsair.

The honest answer depends on the job. Used for what each was built for, they were evenly matched, and both were among the best piston fighters of World War II.

Read more in our guides to the American fighter planes of World War II and the fastest planes of World War II, or open each aircraft’s own page for the full specifications: the North American P-51 Mustang and the Vought F4U Corsair.

FAQ

On our spec data the F4U-4 Corsair is slightly faster, at 388 kt (447 mph) against 383 kt (441 mph) for the P-51. The gap is small and depends on altitude and engine setting. Both were among the fastest piston-engine fighters of the war.
The F4U-4 reaches 388 kt, or 447 mph (719 km/h). Vought’s own spec sheet rounds the same speed to 446 mph. Its climb rate on our spec table is 4,360 ft/min.
Yes. It outclimbed and outdove the Japanese A6M Zero and was faster, though the Zero could turn tighter at low speed. Corsair pilots claimed 2,140 air victories against 189 losses, though that ratio was helped by where and when the Corsair flew.
Luftwaffe commander Hermann Göring was quoted as saying, “When I saw Mustangs over Berlin, I knew the jig was up.” The P-51’s long range let it follow bombers to Berlin and shot down or destroyed on the ground thousands of German aircraft, by American claims.
The P-51, by a wide margin. Our spec table lists 1,650 mi for the Mustang with external tanks against about 1,000 mi for the Corsair. The F4U-4 also lost its wing fuel tanks to improve handling.

About the Author

Tim de Vries

Tim is the owner and lead editor of AeroCorner since 2019, overseeing aviation content covering aircraft, airlines, airports, and the broader aviation industry. Through years of researching, writing, editing, and publishing aviation-focused content, he has developed extensive practical knowledge of commercial aviation and air travel. Based in Asia and a frequent traveler himself, Tim also brings firsthand passenger experience to AeroCorner’s coverage. Outside of publishing, he has also explored aviation firsthand through hands-on flight training in New Zealand.