P-38 vs P-51: Which Was the Better WWII Fighter, and Why Each Ruled a Different Theater

P-38 vs P-51 compared on speed, firepower, reliability and combat record. The Mustang won Europe on dive speed and escort range; the Lightning led the Pacific.

Updated: by Tim de Vries

Add AeroCorner as a preferred source on Google
Lockheed P-38 Lightning and North American P-51 Mustang compared side by side
Lockheed P-38 Lightning and North American P-51 Mustang compared side by side – © Steve Lynes / Robert Sullivan / composite by AeroCorner

The P-51 Mustang was the better fighter over Europe. It was faster, especially in a dive, and by mid-1944 it had replaced the P-38 in most European fighter groups.

The P-38 Lightning was the better fighter in the Pacific. Its two engines made long flights over water safer, and it was the aircraft of Richard Bong, America's top ace, who scored 40 victories in it.

Lockheed P-38 Lightning
Military Propellor Planes
Lockheed P-38 Lightning
ICAO: P38 Military: P-38L Visit aircraft page
North American P-51 Mustang
Military Propellor Planes
North American P-51 Mustang
ICAO: P51 Military: P-51D Visit aircraft page

General

Units
Lockheed P-38 Lightning
Manufacturer
Lockheed (Martin)
ICAO code
P38
Military code
P-38L
Produced
1941–1945
Price
$97,000 (1944)
Engine
2 × Allison V-1710-111/113
Engine type
Piston
Power
2 × 1,600 hp · 1,193 kW +86% (total)
Wing tips
No winglets
Seats
1
Crew
1
North American P-51 Mustang
Manufacturer
North American Aviation (NAA)
ICAO code
P51
Military code
P-51D
Produced
1940–1945
Price
$590,000 (2019)
Engine
1 × Packard (Rolls Royce) V-1650-7 Merlin
Engine type
Piston
Power
1,720 hp · 1,283 kW -46% (total)
Wing tips
No winglets
Seats
1
Crew
1

Dimensions

Lockheed P-38 Lightning
Exterior length
37 ft 10 in 11.53 m 37 ft 10 in 11.53 m +17%
Tail height
12 ft 10 in 3.90 m 12 ft 10 in 3.90 m -4%
Fuselage diameter
— — —
Wing span
52 ft 0 in 15.85 m 52 ft 0 in 15.85 m +41%
North American P-51 Mustang
Exterior length
32 ft 3 in 9.83 m 32 ft 3 in 9.83 m -15%
Tail height
13 ft 5 in 4.08 m 13 ft 5 in 4.08 m +5%
Fuselage diameter
2 ft 11 in 0.90 m 2 ft 11 in 0.90 m
Wing span
37 ft 0 in 11.28 m 37 ft 0 in 11.28 m -29%

Weights

Lockheed P-38 Lightning
Empty weight
12,800 lb 5,806 kg 12,800 lb 5,806 kg +68%
Max payload
4,000 lb 1,800 kg 4,000 lb 1,800 kg
Fuel capacity
416 gal 1,575 L 416 gal 1,575 L +55%
Max takeoff weight
21,600 lb 9,800 kg 21,600 lb 9,800 kg +78%
North American P-51 Mustang
Empty weight
7,635 lb 3,463 kg 7,635 lb 3,463 kg -40%
Max payload
— — —
Fuel capacity
269 gal 1,018 L 269 gal 1,018 L -35%
Max takeoff weight
12,100 lb 5,500 kg 12,100 lb 5,500 kg -44%

Performance

Lockheed P-38 Lightning
Max cruise speed
360 kt · 414 mph 667 km/h 360 kt 414 mph 667 km/h -6%
Max speed
360 kt · 414 mph 667 km/h 360 kt 414 mph 667 km/h -6%
Cruise speed
239 kt · 275 mph 443 km/h 239 kt 275 mph 443 km/h -24%
Approach speed
96 kt · 110 mph 178 km/h 96 kt 110 mph 178 km/h
Rate of climb
4,750 ft/min 24 m/s 4,750 ft/min 24 m/s +48%
Range
1,130 nm · 1,300 mi 2,090 km 1,130 nm 1,300 mi 2,090 km -21%
Service ceiling
44,000 ft 13,400 m 44,000 ft 13,400 m +5%
North American P-51 Mustang
Max cruise speed
383 kt · 441 mph 709 km/h 383 kt 441 mph 709 km/h +6%
Max speed
383 kt · 441 mph 709 km/h 383 kt 441 mph 709 km/h +6%
Cruise speed
315 kt · 362 mph 583 km/h 315 kt 362 mph 583 km/h +32%
Approach speed
— — —
Rate of climb
3,200 ft/min 16 m/s 3,200 ft/min 16 m/s -33%
Range
1,434 nm · 1,650 mi 2,660 km 1,434 nm 1,650 mi 2,660 km +27%
Service ceiling
41,900 ft 12,800 m 41,900 ft 12,800 m -5%

Table of Contents

MeasureP-38 LightningP-51 Mustang
Built forHigh-altitude interceptor (1937 Army Air Corps specification)A British order for a new fighter (1940), later a long-range escort
First flightJanuary 27, 1939 (XP-38, Ben Kelsey)October 26, 1940 (NA-73X, Vance Breese)
LayoutTwin booms, two engines, pilot in a central nacelleSingle engine, conventional fuselage
GunsOne 20 mm cannon and four .50 caliber machine guns, all grouped in the noseSix .50 caliber machine guns (P-51D)
Best theaterPacific, where range and a second engine mattered mostEurope, escorting bombers deep into Germany
Air combat recordCredited with more Japanese aircraft than any other USAAF fighter4,950 aircraft claimed in Europe, about half of all USAAF claims there
Top acesRichard Bong (40 victories), Thomas McGuire (38)Its record is the 4,950 claims above, not one ace
Eighth Air Force fighter groupsReplaced in most groups by mid-194414 of 15 groups flew Mustangs by the end of 1944
Known weaknessCompressibility in dives, cold cockpit, engine trouble over EuropeTricky laminar-flow wing, radiator vulnerable to ground fire
After 1945Withdrawn or given a much smaller roleKept as the USAAF’s standard piston fighter, flew in Korea as the F-51
Dimensions, weights, speed, engine and range data are in the database comparison at the top of this page. This table covers what those specs cannot: purpose, guns, record and weaknesses. Figures from the Wikipedia articles on the P-38 and the P-51, which cite the pilot’s manuals and wartime records.

How we compare the P-38 and the P-51

Both fighters changed a lot between 1941 and 1945, so we compare the versions that fought side by side in 1944 and 1945: the P-38J and P-38L against the P-51B, P-51C and P-51D.

We judge them on four measures: speed and climb, firepower, how they fared in Europe, and how they fared in the Pacific. Full specifications for the Lockheed P-38 Lightning and the North American P-51 Mustang sit in our aircraft database.

The Fork-Tailed Devil nickname is doubtful

The P-38 is said to have earned the German nickname der Gabelschwanz Teufel, the Fork-Tailed Devil, in April 1943. The claim traces to a Life magazine article from August 1943 whose clear aim was to rehabilitate the P-38’s reputation with the American public. No earlier or German source for the name has been found.

Why each fighter was built

The Army Air Corps asked for a twin-engine, high-altitude interceptor in a February 1937 specification written by First Lieutenants Benjamin Kelsey and Gordon Saville. Lockheed won the competition on June 23, 1937, and the XP-38 first flew on January 27, 1939, with Kelsey at the controls.

The P-51 began as a British order. In 1940 the British Purchasing Commission asked North American Aviation to build Curtiss P-40 fighters under license, and the company offered a new design instead. The prototype flew on October 26, 1940, 149 days into the contract, with test pilot Vance Breese at the controls.

You can see what the Mustang replaced in our P-40 Warhawk vs P-51 Mustang comparison.

The first Mustangs used an Allison engine with a single-stage supercharger, and their power dropped off above 15,000 feet (4,600 m). A Rolls-Royce Merlin engine with a two-stage supercharger fixed that without costing range. It arrived in the P-51B in 1943, and it is what turned the Mustang into a bomber escort.

Where the P-38 wins

Two engines over open water

The P-38 was used most extensively and successfully in the Pacific. There it combined exceptional range with the reliability of two engines for long missions over water.

After losing one engine, many P-38 pilots still made it home. The P-51 reached the Pacific later, largely because Europe needed it first.

All the guns in the nose

Most American fighters carried guns in the wings, aimed to cross at one set distance. The P-38 grouped its cannon and machine guns in the nose, so the stream of bullets stayed tight at any range.

A Lightning could reliably hit targets at any range up to 1,000 yards (900 m). That concentrated fire was even deadlier against the lightly armored Japanese fighters than against German aircraft.

Climb and ceiling

The database comparison above shows the Lightning climbing at 4,750 ft/min (24 m/s) against the Mustang’s 3,200 ft/min (16 m/s). It also has the higher service ceiling, 44,000 feet (13,400 m) against 41,900 feet (12,800 m).

German pilots noticed. Johann Pichler, a high-scoring ace, said the P-38 in 1943 was much faster in a climb than the Bf 109.

The aircraft of America’s top aces

Richard Bong, the highest-scoring American ace of World War II, scored all 40 of his victories in P-38s. Thomas McGuire, the second-ranking American ace, scored 38.

On April 18, 1943, 16 P-38Gs flew 435 miles (700 km) from Guadalcanal, 10 to 50 feet (3 to 20 m) above the ocean, to intercept Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto, the architect of Japan’s naval strategy in the Pacific. The Americans lost one P-38, and Japanese search parties found Yamamoto’s body at the jungle crash site the next day.

Where the P-51 wins

Faster, above all in a dive

The database comparison puts the Mustang at 441 mph (709 km/h) against the Lightning’s 414 mph (667 km/h). The smaller, more streamlined P-51 was also significantly faster in a dive.

That dive speed is what led to the P-51 replacing the P-38 in most European fighter groups by mid-1944. For how both rank across the war, see our list of the fastest planes of WWII.

The escort that reached Berlin

From late 1943 the P-51B and P-51C escorted Eighth Air Force bombers over Germany, joined by the P-51D from mid-1944. At first the shorter-range P-38s and P-47s covered the start of a raid and handed over to the Mustangs when they had to turn for home.

Captain Eric Brown, who tested the Mustang at Farnborough in March 1944, called it the best escort because of its incredible range, and the best American dogfighter. Reichsmarschall Hermann Göring was quoted as saying, “When I saw Mustangs over Berlin, I knew the jig was up.”

By the end of 1944, 14 of the Eighth Air Force’s 15 fighter groups flew Mustangs.

The bigger score in Europe

By May 8, 1945, P-51 groups of the Eighth, Ninth and Fifteenth Air Forces had claimed some 4,950 aircraft shot down. That is about half of all USAAF claims in Europe, and the most claimed by any Allied fighter in air-to-air combat.

Those are claims, not confirmed kills, and the Mustang paid for them. Losses were about 2,520 aircraft, and ground-attack missions cost more than air combat because the liquid-cooled Merlin was vulnerable to radiator and coolant line damage.

Part of the Luftwaffe’s answer was a jet, the Me 262. We compare it with the Mustang in our P-51 vs Me 262 comparison.

Why the P-38 struggled in Europe

The P-38 did not fail everywhere. Its engine troubles at high altitude appeared only with the Eighth Air Force in England, while other commands were clamoring for as many Lightnings as they could get.

Three problems stacked up. The cooling systems of the G and H models could not handle the uprated engines at high power, and the turbosuperchargers had their own reliability issues.

The cockpit was also too cold. Pilots were often chilled in Northern Europe and at high altitude, because the engines sat too far from the cockpit for easy heat transfer.

The third problem was compressibility. In a high-speed dive the tail shook, the nose tucked under and the controls could lock up, and until the P-38J-25 added dive recovery flaps German pilots knew the Lightnings would be reluctant to follow them down. A Luftwaffe pilot who did not want to fight could simply start a Split S and dive away.

The later Lightnings did better. The improved J and L models flew with great success out of Italy into Germany at all altitudes, and on March 3, 1944, P-38H pilots of the 55th Fighter Group became the first Allied fighters to reach Berlin, on an escort mission whose bombers had turned back.

German pilots had mixed views of the Lightning. Johannes Steinhoff said its tight turning radius made a dogfight daunting, while Kurt Bühligen recalled it as easy to burn.

After 1945

After the war the USAAF chose the P-51 as its standard piston-engined fighter and withdrew the P-38 or gave it a much smaller role. When the Korean War began, the Mustang, by then redesignated the F-51, was the main American fighter until jets such as the F-86 Sabre took over.

A Mustang also flew in the last combat of its kind. In the 1969 Football War between El Salvador and Honduras, a Salvadoran P-51D was shot down by a Corsair in the last aerial combat between piston-engined fighters.

So which one was better?

Over Europe, the P-51 was the better fighter. It was faster, it dived better, it escorted bombers all the way to Berlin, and by the end of 1944 14 of the Eighth Air Force’s 15 fighter groups flew it.

Over the Pacific, the P-38 was the better fighter. Its two engines and long reach suited missions over open water, and it was the aircraft of America’s two top aces.

The two were meant for different jobs. For how they stack up against the rest, see our ranking of the best WWII fighter planes and our guide to American fighter planes of WWII.

FAQ

German opinion was mixed. Johannes Steinhoff said its turning radius made a dogfight with it daunting, and Franz Stigler said to avoid fighting it head on. Kurt Bühligen, by contrast, recalled the P-38 as easy to burn.
No. The database comparison on this page gives the P-51 a top speed of 441 mph against 414 mph for the P-38, and the P-51 was also significantly faster in a dive. The P-38 climbed faster, at 4,750 ft/min against 3,200 ft/min.
They respected it. Hermann Göring was quoted as saying that when he saw Mustangs over Berlin, he knew the jig was up. The Bf 109 had comparable performance to the P-51 at high altitude, but the Fw 190A was outperformed at the altitude of the B-17s.
The P-51 was significantly faster in a dive, and the P-38 had engine, cooling and cockpit-heating problems over Europe that other theaters did not see. The Eighth Air Force steadily switched its fighter groups to Mustangs, and by the end of 1944, 14 of its 15 groups flew them.
The P-51 was better over Europe and the P-38 was better in the Pacific. The Mustang was faster and could escort bombers to Berlin, while the Lightning’s two engines and long range suited missions over open water.

Sources and references used for research and fact-checking.

About the Author

Tim de Vries

Tim is the owner and lead editor of AeroCorner since 2019, overseeing aviation content covering aircraft, airlines, airports, and the broader aviation industry. Through years of researching, writing, editing, and publishing aviation-focused content, he has developed extensive practical knowledge of commercial aviation and air travel. Based in Asia and a frequent traveler himself, Tim also brings firsthand passenger experience to AeroCorner’s coverage. Outside of publishing, he has also explored aviation firsthand through hands-on flight training in New Zealand.