Fog vs Mist: The Whole Difference Is 5/8 of a Mile

Fog vs mist: the same water droplets, split by how far you can see. The US and international visibility rules, METAR codes and 2025 airport data.

Published: by Tim de Vries

Add AeroCorner as a preferred source on Google
Thomson Airways Boeing 757 G-BYAY on the runway at Leeds Bradford, half hidden in thick fog
A Thomson Airways Boeing 757 departs Leeds Bradford in thick fog. – © Ian Gratton / CC BY 2.0

Get the Newsletter

The latest aviation news and stories sent to your inbox.

Table of Contents

Fog and mist are the same thing: tiny water droplets hanging in the air at ground level. The official dividing line is how far you can see. In a US weather report, visibility under 5/8 mile (1 km) is fog, and anything from 5/8 mile out to 7 miles (11 km) is mist.

Mist is also far more common. At three coastal US airports, San Francisco among them, weather stations logged mist 2 to 11 times as often as fog in 2025.

We compared the two as of October 2026 using the World Meteorological Organization’s definitions, the FAA’s Aviation Weather Handbook, the National Weather Service glossary and a full year of hourly airport weather reports.

CriterionFogMist
Visibility, US weather reportsLess than 5/8 mile (1 km)5/8 mile to less than 7 miles (11 km)
Visibility, international reportsLess than 0.62 mile (1,000 m)0.62 to 3.1 miles (1,000 to 5,000 m)
MoistureTemperature and dewpoint equal or nearly so; seldom forms at a spread above 4°F (2°C)95 to 99% relative humidity
Appearance“Whitish veil” (WMO)“Thin grayish veil” (FAA)
METAR codeFG, plus FZFG, MIFG, BCFG and PRFGBR, with no descriptor allowed
Flight category from visibility aloneAlways LIFRAny of the four: LIFR, IFR, MVFR or VFR
NWS Dense Fog Advisory visibility (1/4 mile or less)Met in 57% of 2025 fog hours at the three airports belowNever: mist starts at 5/8 mile
Arcata-Eureka, California (ACV), 2025324 hours (3.7%)1,494 hours (17.1%)
Nantucket, Massachusetts (ACK), 2025428 hours (4.9%)952 hours (10.9%)
San Francisco International (SFO), 202516 hours (0.2%)172 hours (2.0%)
Sources: WMO International Cloud Atlas; FAA Aviation Weather Handbook (FAA-H-8083-28B); NWS glossary; New Zealand CAA aerodrome weather codes; routine hourly METARs for calendar year 2025 from the Iowa Environmental Mesonet ASOS archive. Hour counts and percentages are our own math, explained below.

How we compared

Definitions come from the WMO International Cloud Atlas, the FAA Aviation Weather Handbook (FAA-H-8083-28B), the NWS glossary and the New Zealand CAA’s aerodrome weather codes, which follow the international METAR rules. The airport figures count every routine hourly METAR for calendar year 2025 (UTC) at Arcata-Eureka, Nantucket and San Francisco, downloaded from the Iowa Environmental Mesonet ASOS archive: one report equals one hour. A fog hour is a report coded FG or FZFG; a mist hour is a report coded BR with no fog code. Flight categories use visibility only, with the FAA handbook’s bands, and ignore cloud ceilings.

Visibility: where mist becomes fog

The World Meteorological Organization draws the line at 0.62 mile (1 km). Its International Cloud Atlas says “fog” is used when droplets cut horizontal visibility at the surface to less than 1 km, and “mist” when they do not. It adds that “in practice, mist is considered synonymous with ‘light fog’.”

The United States uses the same line in its own unit. The FAA’s Aviation Weather Handbook defines fog as droplets that reduce visibility “to less than 5/8 SM (1 km)”, and mist as reducing it to less than 7 statute miles but at least 5/8 mile.

Automated stations make the line even sharper. In the 2025 reports we counted, every fog hour read 1/2 mile or less and every mist hour 3/4 mile or more, because their reports step straight from 1/2 to 3/4 mile.

Public forecasts care about thicker fog. The UK Met Office says public forecasts generally call it fog below about 200 yards (180 m), and dense fog below about 110 yards (100 m). The National Weather Service says fog “is often hazardous when the visibility is reduced to 1/4 mile or less.”

Takeaway: for pilots and weather reports, fog means you can see less than about 5/8 mile; a road forecast may wait until it is much thicker.

How they form, and how much moisture each needs

Both form the same way. The FAA handbook says fog appears when the temperature and dewpoint “become identical (or nearly so)”, either by cooling the air or by adding moisture, and that it “seldom forms” when the spread between them is more than 4°F (2°C).

Mist is the slightly drier stage. The same handbook gives it a relative humidity of 95 to 99% and calls it “an intermediate between fog and haze,” while adding that “there is no distinct line between any of these categories.”

Haze is the one that is genuinely different: a suspension of particles too small to see, not water droplets. Automated stations split mist from haze by the same spread, reporting mist when temperature and dewpoint are within 4°F (about 2°C) and haze otherwise.

The fog itself comes in types named after what cooled or moistened the air: radiation, advection, upslope, frontal and steam fog. Our guide to the types of fog in aviation covers each one and where pilots meet it.

Myth: mist is just very light rain

Mist does not fall. The NWS glossary defines it as droplets suspended in the atmosphere and notes that it is often confused with drizzle. The FAA handbook makes the same point about fog: unlike drizzle, it does not fall to the ground. If the droplets are landing on you, a weather report codes them as drizzle (DZ) or rain, not mist.

Takeaway: fog and mist are one process at two densities, while haze is dry particles and drizzle is water that falls.

How they look, and how long they last

Fog “forms a whitish veil that covers the landscape,” says the WMO, and the air in it “usually feels damp, moist or wet.” When lit, individual fog droplets are often visible to the naked eye, moving in a turbulent way.

Mist is thinner. The FAA describes “a thin grayish veil that covers the landscape,” similar to fog but less of a block to vision.

Mist also clears faster. The Met Office says it “typically dissipates more quickly than fog and can disappear rapidly with even slight winds.” BBC Weather adds that it can thicken overnight into fog once visibility drops below 0.62 mile (1,000 m).

Takeaway: fog is white and lingers, mist is gray and goes with the first breeze.

How a weather report codes them

In a METAR, the hourly airport weather report, fog is FG and mist is BR. The odd abbreviation comes from the French word for mist, brume.

Only fog gets qualifiers. The FAA handbook lists shallow (MIFG), patches (BCFG) and partial (PRFG) as descriptors coded only with fog, and states flatly: “Mist (BR) is not coded with any descriptor.” Freezing fog (FZFG) is reported when the temperature is below 32°F (0°C).

Forecasts follow the same rule. In a TAF, a forecast visibility from 5/8 to 6 miles is coded BR and anything under 5/8 mile FG, “FZBR is not a valid significant weather combination,” and mist is never forecast with visibility above 6 miles.

Abroad, the mist band is narrower. New Zealand’s Civil Aviation Authority, following the international code, uses BR only for visibility between 0.62 and 3.1 miles (1,000 to 5,000 m). A US station can report mist out to 7 miles.

Takeaway: FG and BR mean the same weather in every METAR, but a US report will call it mist at visibilities a European one would leave blank.

What each means for flying

Aviation weather maps color airports by flight category. The FAA handbook sets the visibility bands: LIFR below 1 mile, IFR from 1 to under 3 miles, MVFR from 3 to 5 miles and VFR above 5 miles.

Fog always lands in the worst band, because 5/8 mile is already under 1 mile. Mist can land in any of the four. Of the 2,618 mist hours at our three airports in 2025, 7.6% were LIFR on visibility alone, 30.9% IFR, 42.8% MVFR and 18.7% VFR.

That matters for visual pilots. Under 14 CFR 91.155, flying under visual flight rules below 10,000 feet in Class B, C, D or E airspace needs 3 miles of visibility, so roughly 4 in 10 of those mist hours reported visibility below that.

Fog shuts that door almost entirely. Even special VFR, the clearance that lets a pilot operate near a controlled airport below normal VFR minimums, needs at least 1 mile of ground visibility for an airplane to take off or land under 91.157.

At 1 mile or less, the METAR also starts reporting runway visual range where the airport has the equipment: the instrument-measured distance a pilot can see down the runway.

Takeaway: fog always means instrument conditions, while mist ranges from a legal VFR day to low IFR.

How often each one happens

We counted every routine hourly METAR for 2025 at three coastal airports. Arcata-Eureka in Northern California reported mist in 1,494 hours and fog in 324. Nantucket logged 952 hours of mist and 428 of fog, the most fog of the three.

When fog did form, it was usually thick. In 57% of the fog hours at the three airports, visibility was 1/4 mile or less, the level at which the National Weather Service issues a Dense Fog Advisory when it covers a wide area.

San Francisco's fog is mostly cloud

SFO reported a cloud ceiling below 1,000 feet in 541 hours of 2025, but surface fog in only 16. The FAA handbook says fog differs from a cloud only in that its base is at the ground. When the gray deck hangs over the runways instead of sitting on them, the METAR codes it as cloud.

San Francisco International logged the fewest hours of either: 172 of mist and 16 of fog, or 10.8 mist hours for every hour of fog.

Takeaway: mist is the everyday condition and fog the rarer, thicker one, even on coasts famous for fog.

The difference in one sentence

Fog and mist are the same suspended water droplets, and a weather report calls it fog when you can see less than 5/8 mile (1 km) and mist when you can see farther, up to 7 miles in the US or about 3 miles abroad.

FAQ

Physically, yes: both are tiny water droplets suspended in the air at ground level. The World Meteorological Organization says that in practice mist is considered synonymous with light fog. The two names only mark how far you can see through it.
Visibility. It is fog when droplets cut visibility to less than 1 km, which US weather reports write as 5/8 statute mile, and mist when you can see farther. Mist is also slightly drier, at 95 to 99% relative humidity according to the FAA, and it clears more quickly.
No. Mist is suspended in the air and does not fall, while drizzle is precipitation that reaches the ground. The National Weather Service notes that mist is often confused with drizzle, and weather reports code them separately as BR and DZ.
Mist and fog are water droplets, while haze is a suspension of extremely small dry particles such as dust, smoke or pollution. US automated stations tell mist from haze by the gap between temperature and dewpoint: 4°F (about 2°C) or less is reported as mist, more than that as haze.
BR means mist, from the French word brume. In the US it is reported when visibility is from 5/8 mile to less than 7 miles, and in international reports when it is between 0.62 and 3.1 miles (1,000 and 5,000 m). Unlike fog (FG), mist never takes a descriptor such as shallow or patches.
Fog is named after what produced it. The FAA lists radiation, advection and upslope fog, which form when air cools to its dewpoint, and frontal and steam fog, which form when moisture is added. Fog below freezing is freezing fog, fog made of ice crystals is ice fog, and fog too shallow to block vision 6 feet above the ground is shallow fog.
In light mist, often yes: visual flight below 10,000 feet in most controlled airspace needs 3 miles of visibility, and mist can be anywhere from 5/8 mile to 7 miles. In fog, not visually. Fog is under 5/8 mile, below every airplane VFR visibility minimum in 14 CFR 91.155 and the 1 mile a special VFR clearance needs, so an airplane flies in it only under instrument flight rules.

Get the Newsletter

The latest aviation news and stories sent to your inbox.

About the Author

Tim de Vries

Tim is the owner and lead editor of AeroCorner since 2019, overseeing aviation content covering aircraft, airlines, airports, and the broader aviation industry. Through years of researching, writing, editing, and publishing aviation-focused content, he has developed extensive practical knowledge of commercial aviation and air travel. Based in Asia and a frequent traveler himself, Tim also brings firsthand passenger experience to AeroCorner’s coverage. Outside of publishing, he has also explored aviation firsthand through hands-on flight training in New Zealand.