China’s Big Three Airlines Post a Combined $1.2 Billion Loss as Fuel Costs Outrun Revenue

Tim de Vries · August 31, 2026 09:38 UTC

China's Big Three airlines posted a combined first-half 2026 net loss near $1.22 billion as jet fuel costs jumped 35% and outran record passenger revenue.

Add AeroCorner as a preferred source on Google
China Eastern Airlines Boeing 777 at LAX
China Eastern Airlines Boeing 777 at LAX © Tomás Del Coro

Get the Newsletter

The latest aviation news and stories sent to your inbox.

China’s three largest state-owned airlines reported a combined first-half net loss of about 8.2 billion yuan (roughly 1.22 billion US dollars) in interim results released in late August 2026, according to their stock exchange filings. It was the seventh year in a row that Air China, China Eastern and China Southern have lost money over the first six months.

Each carrier said its fuel bill rose between 35 and 38 percent from a year earlier, driven by a jet fuel price spike tied to the conflict in the Middle East. Revenue grew at all three airlines, but not by enough to close the gap.

What the filings showed

Air China reported a net loss of 2.3 billion yuan, widening from 1.81 billion yuan a year earlier, according to its filing. China Eastern posted a 2.2 billion yuan loss, up from 1.43 billion yuan. China Southern fared worst, with a 3.7 billion yuan loss against 1.53 billion yuan in the first half of 2025.

Revenue moved the other way. Air China’s rose about 10.5 percent, China Eastern’s about 11.1 percent and China Southern’s about 9.7 percent, helped by a recovery in international demand. None of the three declared an interim dividend, and their Shanghai-listed shares have each fallen at least 36 percent in 2026. All three had filed profit warnings on July 15 flagging the loss range.

Why fuel hit them harder than rivals

Fuel is typically an airline’s largest single cost, and it is the one big expense that cannot be trimmed quickly when prices climb. Many Asian and European airlines soften a price move by hedging, buying financial contracts months ahead that lock in part of the future bill.

China’s carriers hedge very little. China Southern told investors there was currently “no effective means available” to manage its fuel exposure, leaving the airline to absorb the increase directly.

The price move was large. Jet fuel in the second quarter of 2026 ran close to 90 percent above a year earlier and stayed more than 50 percent above pre-conflict levels even after easing from its peak, FlightGlobal reported, as fears over the Strait of Hormuz and export curbs by several Asian refiners kept supply tight.

Demand did not make up the difference. China Eastern blamed “disrupted international routes and persistently elevated jet fuel prices linked to the Middle East conflict,” the same regional risk that has pushed other carriers to drop long-haul routes. At home, fare increases stayed limited by a soft economy and competition from high-speed rail.

Reality check

Revenue at all three carriers grew close to 10 percent in the first half, and passenger numbers held near record levels. The loss still widened because fuel is the cost an airline can least control, and China’s big carriers hedge almost none of it.

The pressure has not eased into the peak season. Industry data cited by Reuters projects about 142 million trips across July and August, a 3.6 percent drop from last year and the first summer contraction since 2022. Qantas and Air New Zealand flagged the same fuel shock in their own August results.

For travelers, the squeeze points one way over time. When carriers cannot raise domestic fares and cannot cut fuel, the pressure valves are trimming capacity and charging more on international routes, part of the reason airfares have climbed worldwide this year.

Get the Newsletter

The latest aviation news and stories sent to your inbox.