Table of Contents
The Su-57 wins on stealth and weapons carriage. The Eurofighter Typhoon wins on proven service, fleet size and combat record.
Neither jet is the better fighter in every way. They were built for different jobs by different air forces, and the real answer depends on what you ask of them.
| Category | Eurofighter Typhoon | Sukhoi Su-57 Felon |
|---|---|---|
| Generation | 4.5 generation, not stealth | Fifth generation, stealth-shaped |
| Weapons carriage | 13 hardpoints, all external | Internal bays for primary weapons |
| Radar | Captor-M, with Captor-E AESA on newer jets | N036 Byelka AESA with side and wing arrays |
| Maneuvering aids | Canards and relaxed stability | Thrust vectoring and relaxed stability |
| Gun | 27 mm Mauser BK-27 | 30 mm GSh-30-1 |
| First flight | March 1994 (prototype) | January 2010 (prototype) |
| Entered service | August 2003 | December 2020 |
| Combat debut | Libya, March 2011 | Reported cruise missile launches over Ukraine, 2024 |
The Short Answer: Stealth Against Maturity
The Sukhoi Su-57 is the more modern design. It is shaped to reduce its radar signature and carries its main weapons inside the airframe.
The Typhoon is the more proven aircraft. It has been in service since 2003, flies with nine air forces and has been used in real operations from Libya to the Middle East.
One correction to what you may have read elsewhere: both jets are twin-engine fighters. The Su-57 is not a single-engine jet.
Where the Eurofighter Typhoon Wins

The Typhoon has a long record of actual use. RAF Typhoons flew their first combat mission over Libya on 21 March 2011, and Italian Typhoons began combat air patrols there on 29 March.
It is the main air-defense fighter for most of its operators. That daily routine of intercepts and NATO air policing is the kind of service the Su-57 has barely begun.
The design is also built to be upgraded. The Typhoon entered service with the mechanically scanned Captor-M radar, and newer jets get the Captor-E AESA radar.
It is also a capable strike aircraft. It carries the Meteor long-range air-to-air missile alongside precision bombs and cruise missiles, with 13 hardpoints to hang them on.

Production is another strength. The first series jets flew in 2003, and the type has kept rolling off the line for two decades, with nine air forces now flying it.
Where the Sukhoi Su-57 Wins

Stealth is the headline gap. The Su-57 aligns its planform edges, recesses its antennas and carries its primary weapons internally. The Typhoon hangs its weapons outside the airframe, which is why it is not considered a stealth fighter.
The combined effect of its shaping and radar-absorbent material is estimated to cut the Su-57’s radar cross-section to about thirty times smaller than the Su-27 it descends from. It is still far from the F-22 or F-35 on that measure, so treat it as low-observable rather than invisible.
The Su-57 also carries thrust-vectoring nozzles, which let it hold maneuvers a conventional fighter cannot. The Typhoon relies on its canards and relaxed stability instead.

Its sensor fit is broader as well. Alongside the forward radar, the Su-57 spreads antennas across the cheeks and wing leading edges, which the Typhoon has no equivalent for.
The Su-57 can also supercruise, flying supersonic without afterburner, at about Mach 1.3. The Typhoon can supercruise too, but published figures run lower and vary by source.
What About Combat Experience?
This is where the gap is widest. The Typhoon has years of reported operations, including strikes in Libya and air defense over the Middle East.
The Su-57 has seen far less. Russia has reportedly used it to launch Kh-69 cruise missiles at Ukrainian targets from within its own airspace, which is a long way from fighting through contested skies.
Production has also run slower than planned. Russia announced a purchase of 76 aircraft in 2019, and deliveries have lagged that schedule.
Radar, Sensors and Weapons
The Typhoon carries the Euroradar Captor family of radars and a passive infrared search and track sensor called PIRATE. Passive sensors let a pilot find a target without giving away the jet’s own radar emissions.
The Su-57 pairs X-band and L-band radar signals through its Sh-121 system. The extra antennas around the airframe give it wider coverage than a single nose array.
On weapons, the Typhoon fires the Meteor and AIM-120 AMRAAM air-to-air missiles, and later jets add Storm Shadow and Brimstone for strike missions. Its 27 mm cannon covers close range.
The Su-57 carries the R-77M medium-range missile and a development of the R-37M long-range missile in its main bays. Its 30 mm GSh-30-1 cannon sits inside the airframe.
Carrying those missiles internally keeps the airframe clean, which preserves its stealth shaping.
Operators and Exports
The Typhoon is in service with Austria, Germany, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom, as well as Saudi Arabia, Oman, Kuwait and Qatar. It is the backbone of European air defense.
The Su-57 has one confirmed foreign customer. Algeria signed a contract for 14 aircraft on 27 December 2019, and Russia remains its main operator.
That difference matters in practice. A wider customer base means more spare parts, more training and more upgrades, which keeps a fighter relevant for decades.
Who Would Win in a Fight?
There has never been a real engagement between the two, so any answer is an informed guess. The honest version depends on the setting.
At long range, the Su-57’s smaller radar signature could let it see and shoot first. In a close, visual fight, both jets are very agile, and pilot skill and supporting aircraft matter more than the airframe.
The Typhoon also benefits from the wider NATO system around it, including tankers, airborne radar and datalinks. A single jet is rarely the whole story.
For other pairings, see how the Typhoon stacks up against the Su-35, or how the Su-57 compares with the F-22 Raptor. Our guides to the best Russian fighter jets and European fighter jets cover the wider field.
FAQ
Sources and references used for research and fact-checking.
About the Author
Tim is the owner and lead editor of AeroCorner since 2019, overseeing aviation content covering aircraft, airlines, airports, and the broader aviation industry. Through years of researching, writing, editing, and publishing aviation-focused content, he has developed extensive practical knowledge of commercial aviation and air travel. Based in Asia and a frequent traveler himself, Tim also brings firsthand passenger experience to AeroCorner’s coverage. Outside of publishing, he has also explored aviation firsthand through hands-on flight training in New Zealand.