Boeing 777 vs 787 Dreamliner: Size, Range, and Which Is Better to Fly

Boeing 777 vs 787 Dreamliner compared: the 777-300 seats more, the 787-10 flies 25% farther on less fuel, and seat width is your airline's choice.

Updated: by Tim de Vries

Add AeroCorner as a preferred source on Google
Boeing 777-300 and Boeing 787-10 Dreamliner compared side by side
Boeing 777-300 and Boeing 787-10 Dreamliner compared side by side – © Masakatsu Ukon / Aero Icarus / composite by AeroCorner

The Boeing 777 is the bigger aircraft and the 787 Dreamliner is the newer and more efficient one. The 777-300 carries more people on a shorter leg. The 787-10 flies about 25 percent farther while carrying about 25 percent less fuel.

Which one you would rather sit in is a separate question, and the answer is not the aircraft. It is whether your airline chose nine seats across or ten.

Boeing 777-300
Jumbo Passenger Jets
Boeing 777-300
ICAO: B773 IATA: 773 Visit aircraft page
Boeing 787-10 Dreamliner
Jumbo Passenger Jets
Boeing 787-10 Dreamliner

General

Units
Boeing 777-300
Manufacturer
Boeing
ICAO code
B773
IATA code
773
Produced
1997–2006
Price
$210 million (2006)
Engine
2 × Pratt & Whitney PW4090/PW4098 or Rolls-Royce Trent 892
Engine type
Turbofan
Thrust
2 × 98,000 lbf · 436 kN +29% (total)
Avionics
Honeywell Avionics
Wing tips
No winglets
Seats
550 economy · 451 business · 368 first
Crew
2
Boeing 787-10 Dreamliner
Manufacturer
Boeing
ICAO code
B78X
IATA code
—
Produced
2016–Present
Price
$338.4 million (2019)
Engine
2 × Rolls-Royce Trent 1000-J3 or General Electric GEnx-1B76
Engine type
Turbofan
Thrust
2 × 76,000 lbf · 338 kN -22% (total)
Avionics
Collins Aerospace flight deck: five 15.1 in LCD displays, dual head-up displays, integrated surveillance
Wing tips
Raked wingtips
Seats
440 economy · 290 business
Crew
2

Dimensions

Boeing 777-300
Cabin width
19 ft 3 in 5.86 m 19 ft 3 in 5.86 m +7%
Cabin height
7 ft 3 in 2.20 m 7 ft 3 in 2.20 m -12%
Cabin length
194 ft 4 in 59.24 m 194 ft 4 in 59.24 m -4%
Exterior length
242 ft 4 in 73.86 m 242 ft 4 in 73.86 m +8%
Tail height
60 ft 8 in 18.50 m 60 ft 8 in 18.50 m +9%
Fuselage diameter
20 ft 4 in 6.19 m 20 ft 4 in 6.19 m +8%
Wing span
199 ft 11 in 60.93 m 199 ft 11 in 60.93 m +1%
Baggage volume
701 ft 7 in 213.85 m 701 ft 7 in 213.85 m +12%
Boeing 787-10 Dreamliner
Cabin width
18 ft 0 in 5.49 m 18 ft 0 in 5.49 m -6%
Cabin height
8 ft 2 in 2.50 m 8 ft 2 in 2.50 m +14%
Cabin length
203 ft 5 in 62.00 m 203 ft 5 in 62.00 m +5%
Exterior length
224 ft 1 in 68.30 m 224 ft 1 in 68.30 m -8%
Tail height
55 ft 10 in 17.02 m 55 ft 10 in 17.02 m -8%
Fuselage diameter
18 ft 10 in 5.75 m 18 ft 10 in 5.75 m -7%
Wing span
197 ft 3 in 60.12 m 197 ft 3 in 60.12 m -1%
Baggage volume
624 ft 4 in 190.30 m 624 ft 4 in 190.30 m -11%

Weights

Boeing 777-300
Empty weight
347,800 lb 157,759 kg 347,800 lb 157,759 kg +16%
Max payload
147,000 lb 66,500 kg 147,000 lb 66,500 kg +17%
Fuel capacity
44,700 gal 169,208 L 44,700 gal 169,208 L +34%
Max takeoff weight
660,000 lb 299,500 kg 660,000 lb 299,500 kg +15%
Max landing weight
524,000 lb 237,500 kg 524,000 lb 237,500 kg +18%
Boeing 787-10 Dreamliner
Empty weight
298,700 lb 135,488 kg 298,700 lb 135,488 kg -14%
Max payload
126,500 lb 57,500 kg 126,500 lb 57,500 kg -14%
Fuel capacity
33,380 gal 126,357 L 33,380 gal 126,357 L -25%
Max takeoff weight
574,000 lb 260,500 kg 574,000 lb 260,500 kg -13%
Max landing weight
445,000 lb 202,000 kg 445,000 lb 202,000 kg -15%

Performance

Boeing 777-300
Max cruise speed
510 kt · 587 mph 945 km/h 510 kt 587 mph 945 km/h -1%
Max speed
510 kt · 587 mph 945 km/h 510 kt 587 mph 945 km/h -1%
Cruise speed
490 kt · 564 mph 907 km/h 490 kt 564 mph 907 km/h +0%
Approach speed
149 kt · 171 mph 276 km/h 149 kt 171 mph 276 km/h +6%
Rate of climb
3,000 ft/min 15 m/s 3,000 ft/min 15 m/s 0%
Range
6,005 nm · 6,910 mi 11,120 km 6,005 nm 6,910 mi 11,120 km -20%
Service ceiling
43,100 ft 13,100 m 43,100 ft 13,100 m +5%
Takeoff distance
10,600 ft 3,230 m 10,600 ft 3,230 m +16%
Landing distance
5,900 ft 1,800 m 5,900 ft 1,800 m +18%
Boeing 787-10 Dreamliner
Max cruise speed
516 kt · 594 mph 956 km/h 516 kt 594 mph 956 km/h +1%
Max speed
516 kt · 594 mph 956 km/h 516 kt 594 mph 956 km/h +1%
Cruise speed
488 kt · 562 mph 904 km/h 488 kt 562 mph 904 km/h 0%
Approach speed
140 kt · 161 mph 259 km/h 140 kt 161 mph 259 km/h -6%
Rate of climb
3,000 ft/min 15 m/s 3,000 ft/min 15 m/s 0%
Range
7,500 nm · 8,630 mi 13,890 km 7,500 nm 8,630 mi 13,890 km +25%
Service ceiling
41,100 ft 12,500 m 41,100 ft 12,500 m -5%
Takeoff distance
9,100 ft 2,770 m 9,100 ft 2,770 m -14%
Landing distance
5,000 ft 1,520 m 5,000 ft 1,520 m -16%

Table of Contents

Boeing 777-300Boeing 787-10 Dreamliner
Generation1990s aluminum widebody2010s composite widebody
Entered serviceMay 1998, Cathay PacificApril 2018, Singapore Airlines
Built toReplace early 747s on dense regional routesStretch the Dreamliner for high-volume routes
ProductionEnded 2006, 60 deliveredIn production, 143 delivered
Economy layout airlines fly9 or 10 abreast, the airline picks9 abreast on most airlines, 8 on a few
Cabin selling pointThe widest twin-aisle cabin in service6,000 ft cabin altitude and larger windows
Can an airline still order oneNoYes
Best atMoving the most people on one pair of enginesFlying farthest on the least fuel
Delivery counts through June 30, 2026. Dimensions, weights, performance and engine data are in the specification panel above.

Which variants this page compares

The panel above compares the original Boeing 777-300 with the Boeing 787-10, the longest Dreamliner. Only 60 of the non-ER 777-300 were built. The aircraft most travelers mean by “the 777” is the 777-300ER, of which 833 were delivered, and its numbers sit between the two on range while matching the -300 on cabin width.

Which one is actually better to fly?

This is the question most people are really asking, and the honest answer is that the aircraft type barely matters. What matters is how many seats your airline bolted into each row.

The 777 does have the wider cabin. Its interior measures 19 ft 3 in across against the 787’s 18 ft, a gap of roughly 15 inches.

Airlines spent that 15 inches on a tenth seat rather than on you. A 777 in the common 10-abreast layout gives economy passengers seats of about 17 to 17.5 inches, and a 787 at 9 abreast gives about 17 to 17.3 inches.

Those ranges overlap. Walking onto a 777 instead of a 787 buys you, at best, a fraction of an inch.

The layout that genuinely changes the flight is a 777 at 9 abreast, which widens economy seats to roughly 18.5 inches. That is a different class of comfort, and it is increasingly rare.

In 2001 only 5 percent of 777 deliveries left Everett with 10-abreast economy. By 2016 that had passed 50 percent.

Japan Airlines, Korean Air, Cathay Pacific and Singapore Airlines are among the carriers that have kept 9 abreast on 777s. Korean Air planned a switch to 10 abreast and reversed it after public criticism.

The myth this page used to repeat

“The 777 is bigger, so it is more comfortable” does not survive contact with a seat map. The 777’s extra cabin width was converted into an extra seat on most of the fleet, which is why a 10-abreast 777 and a 9-abreast 787 feel almost identical in economy. Check the seat map for your specific flight, not the aircraft type.

Size: where the 777 wins outright

On every measure of bulk, the 777-300 is the larger aircraft. It is 18 ft 3 in longer than the 787-10 and takes off at 660,000 lb against the Dreamliner’s 574,000 lb.

Seat counts follow. The 777-300 is certified for up to 550 passengers and typically carried 368 in three classes, while Boeing markets the 787-10 at 300 to 375 seats in two classes.

The extreme case is on Japanese domestic routes. ANA flies its remaining 777-300s in a two-class layout holding 514 seats, a figure no Dreamliner will ever reach.

One measure refuses to cooperate, and it is the one nobody expects. The two aircraft have almost the same wingspan: 199 ft 11 in for the 777-300 and 197 ft 3 in for the 787-10.

They need the same parking space

Under 3 feet separates the two wingspans, so both aircraft fall into the same ICAO Code E airport category and can use the same gates, taxiways and stands. The 787 reaches that span with a slender composite wing built for efficiency. The 777 reaches it with a much broader aluminum wing built to lift 86,000 lb more.

For where these two sit among the genuinely enormous aircraft, see our ranking of the largest commercial airplanes.

Range and fuel: where the 787 wins outright

Here the comparison inverts, and it does so more sharply than most readers expect. The 787-10 flies 7,500 nmi. The 777-300 manages 6,005 nmi.

The Dreamliner goes about 25 percent farther. It does that while carrying 33,380 US gallons of fuel against the 777-300’s 44,700, roughly 11,300 gallons less.

Farther on less fuel, with a broadly comparable seat count, is the entire commercial argument for the Dreamliner. It is why the 787 replaced the 777 on so many route maps.

The engines tell the same story. The 777-300 needs two turbofans of 98,000 lbf each, while the 787-10 does its job on 76,000 lbf per side, roughly 22 percent less thrust.

Lighter structure is what buys that. The 787’s airframe is about 50 percent composite by weight and 80 percent by volume, against a 777 built largely from aluminum.

One caveat keeps this honest. The 787-10 is the range-limited Dreamliner, not the long-legged one, so a 787-9 or a 777-300ER is the aircraft you will find on the world’s longest flights.

The cabin technology gap

The composite fuselage does something for passengers that has nothing to do with seat width. Because carbon fiber does not fatigue the way aluminum does under repeated pressurization, Boeing could pressurize the 787 harder.

The result is a cabin altitude of 6,000 feet rather than the 8,000 feet a conventional airliner holds. Cabin humidity sits nearer 25 percent instead of the single digits typical of an aluminum jet.

Boeing markets this as less fatigue and less dehydration on a long flight. It is a real engineering difference, not a livery choice, and it is the one thing a 777 cannot answer.

The 787 also carries the largest windows on any current airliner, dimmed electronically rather than by a pull-down shade. Whether you like losing control of your own window shade is a separate argument.

Which is safer?

Both aircraft have strong records, and neither is meaningfully risky. The numbers below are the full public tally, not a ranking.

As of May 2024 the 777 had been involved in 31 accidents and incidents, including five hull-loss accidents out of eight hull losses in total, with 542 fatalities including three people on the ground. That record spans three decades of service across a fleet that now numbers 1,794 delivered aircraft.

The 787 flew without a fatal accident for more than 13 years in service. It was grounded worldwide in January 2013 over lithium-ion battery fires, returning in April 2013 after the FAA approved a redesigned battery.

Air India Flight 171, a 787-8, crashed shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad on June 12, 2025, killing 241 of the 242 people aboard and 19 on the ground.

India’s AAIB found that both engine fuel control switches moved from RUN to CUTOFF within seconds of liftoff, one second apart. Its preliminary report stated there were no recommended actions for 787-8 or GEnx-1B operators and manufacturers.

That investigation is still open. The AAIB told India’s Supreme Court that a draft final report was expected in October 2026, so any conclusion about cause should be treated as provisional until it is published.

How to read these numbers

Neither type has a design flaw that should influence which flight you book. The 777 has more incidents than the 787 largely because it entered service 16 years earlier and has flown far more sectors. Raw accident counts reward youth and small fleets, which is why they are a poor way to rank aircraft safety.

The broader picture across manufacturers is in our review of the safest commercial aircraft.

Why the 777 is disappearing and the 787 is not

The original 777-300 left production in 2006 after just 60 deliveries. The far more successful 777-300ER followed it out in December 2024, when the last passenger example went to Ethiopian Airlines.

That closed a 20-year run of the aircraft that had been the flagship of most of the world’s major airlines. Boeing ended it quietly, with none of the ceremony a final rollout usually gets.

Two things replaced it. The 787 took the efficiency argument, and the 777X was meant to take the capacity argument.

The 777X has not arrived. Boeing now anticipates first delivery of the 777-9 in 2027, about seven years later than the original plan, as detailed in our report on the 777X delay.

The freighter is the one piece of the old 777 still being built. In September 2026 the FAA granted Boeing an emissions exemption covering up to 35 more 777Fs, taking first airworthiness certificates from January 1, 2028 through January 1, 2031.

The Dreamliner has the opposite problem, which is building them fast enough. Boeing has delivered 1,303 787s and was still winning new business in 2026, including Delta’s January order for 30 787-10s with options for 30 more.

How to tell them apart from the ground

The landing gear is the giveaway that never fails. The 777 is the only airliner with six wheels on each main gear, while the 787 has four.

The nose is next. The 787 has a four-panel windscreen and a smooth, sculpted profile, while the 777 carries six cockpit windows.

At the back of the engines, the 787’s GEnx and Trent 1000 nacelles have serrated chevron trailing edges cut for noise reduction. The 777’s engines do not.

In flight, watch the wing. The 787’s composite wing flexes visibly upward and ends in a long raked tip, and the original 777-300 has no raked tip at all, though the 777-300ER and 777-200LR do.

FAQ

Neither type is reliably better, because your airline’s seat layout decides the experience. A 777 at 10 abreast gives economy seats of about 17 to 17.5 inches and a 787 at 9 abreast gives about 17 to 17.3 inches, which is effectively the same. The layout worth seeking out is a 777 at 9 abreast, where seats widen to roughly 18.5 inches. Check the seat map for your specific flight rather than the aircraft type.
Both have strong records and neither has a defect that should affect which flight you book. As of May 2024 the 777 had been involved in 31 accidents and incidents with eight hull losses and 542 fatalities, across three decades and a fleet that now numbers 1,794 aircraft. The 787 went more than 13 years without a fatal accident until Air India Flight 171 crashed on June 12, 2025, killing 241 of 242 aboard and 19 on the ground. That investigation remains open.
The passenger 777 was discontinued because newer aircraft burn less fuel for the same job. The original 777-300 ended production in 2006 after 60 deliveries, and the best-selling 777-300ER followed in December 2024 when the final passenger example was delivered to Ethiopian Airlines. Boeing intended the 777X to replace it, but first delivery of the 777-9 is now anticipated in 2027. The 777F freighter is still being built under an FAA emissions exemption.
The 787 was the first airliner built mostly from composite material, about 50 percent by weight and 80 percent by volume. Because carbon fiber resists pressurization fatigue better than aluminum, Boeing could hold the cabin at 6,000 feet instead of 8,000 feet and keep humidity nearer 25 percent, which reduces fatigue and dehydration on long flights. It also carries the largest windows on any current airliner, dimmed electronically rather than with a shade.
Yes, on almost every measure. The 777-300 is 18 ft 3 in longer than the 787-10, takes off at 660,000 lb against 574,000 lb, and has a cabin about 15 inches wider. The exception is wingspan, where the two are within 3 feet of each other, so both aircraft use the same airport gate category.
The 787 is newer by two decades. The 777-300 entered service with Cathay Pacific in May 1998, while the 787-10 entered service with Singapore Airlines in April 2018. The 787 remains in production and the passenger 777 does not.
Count the wheels on the main landing gear. The 777 is the only airliner with six wheels per main gear, while the 787 has four. The 787 also has a four-panel cockpit windscreen against the 777’s six windows, and its engine nacelles have serrated chevron trailing edges that the 777’s do not.
The seat product is chosen by the airline, not the aircraft, so the same carrier usually fits a near-identical suite to both. Where the airframe helps is width: the 777’s cabin is about 15 inches wider, which gives a 1-2-1 business layout more room per suite than the same layout on a 787. Both types commonly fly 1-2-1 in business.
Barely, and not for much longer. Only 60 of the non-ER 777-300 were built between 1997 and 2006. ANA operates the last few on Japanese domestic routes in a 514-seat two-class layout and has confirmed they leave the fleet by the end of March 2027. The 777-300ER, of which 833 were delivered, remains widely flown.
The cabin conditions behind the claim are real and measurable. The 787 holds a cabin altitude of 6,000 feet rather than 8,000 feet, and humidity nearer 25 percent than the single digits of an aluminum jet, both of which Boeing links to less fatigue and dehydration. How much any individual passenger notices varies, and flight length, sleep and seat comfort still matter more.

About the Author

Tim de Vries

Tim is the owner and lead editor of AeroCorner since 2019, overseeing aviation content covering aircraft, airlines, airports, and the broader aviation industry. Through years of researching, writing, editing, and publishing aviation-focused content, he has developed extensive practical knowledge of commercial aviation and air travel. Based in Asia and a frequent traveler himself, Tim also brings firsthand passenger experience to AeroCorner’s coverage. Outside of publishing, he has also explored aviation firsthand through hands-on flight training in New Zealand.