A350 vs 787: How Airbus’s Wider Twin Differs From Boeing’s Dreamliner

A350-900 vs 787-9 compared: the A350 has the wider cabin and one engine choice, the 787-9 is lighter with two engine options. See how they differ.

Updated:

Add AeroCorner as a preferred source on Google
Airbus A350-900 and Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner compared side by side
Airbus A350-900 and Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner compared side by side – © Alan Wilson / composite by AeroCorner

The A350-900 is the larger, wider-cabin aircraft, with seats about half an inch wider in a nine-across layout. The 787-9 is the lighter one, with a choice of two engine makers.

Both are mostly composite long-haul twins that first flew within months of each other in 2013. This page compares the A350-900 with the 787-9.

Airbus A350-900
Jumbo Passenger Jets
Airbus A350-900
Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner
Jumbo Passenger Jets
Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner
ICAO: B789 IATA: 789 Visit aircraft page

General

Units
Airbus A350-900
Manufacturer
Airbus
ICAO code
A359
IATA code
—
Produced
2013–Onward
Price
$317.4 million (2018)
Engine
2 × Rolls-Royce Trent XWB-84
Engine type
Turbofan
Thrust
2 × 84,200 lbf · 375 kN +19% (total)
Avionics
Thales Avionics Suite
Wing tips
Blended tips
Seats
315 economy · 314 business
Crew
—
Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner
Manufacturer
Boeing
ICAO code
B789
IATA code
789
Produced
2013–Present
Price
$292.5 million (2020)
Engine
2 × General Electric GEnx-1B or Rolls-Royce Trent 1000
Engine type
Turbofan
Thrust
2 × 71,000 lbf · 316 kN -16% (total)
Avionics
Honeywell and Rockwell Collins avionics
Wing tips
Raked wingtips
Seats
420 economy · 250 business
Crew
2

Dimensions

Airbus A350-900
Cabin width
17 ft 9 in 5.40 m 17 ft 9 in 5.40 m -2%
Cabin height
7 ft 3 in 2.20 m 7 ft 3 in 2.20 m -12%
Cabin length
167 ft 5 in 51.04 m 167 ft 5 in 51.04 m -9%
Exterior length
219 ft 2 in 66.80 m 219 ft 2 in 66.80 m +6%
Tail height
55 ft 11 in 17.05 m 55 ft 11 in 17.05 m +0%
Fuselage diameter
19 ft 6 in 5.94 m 19 ft 6 in 5.94 m +3%
Wing span
212 ft 5 in 64.75 m 212 ft 5 in 64.75 m +8%
Baggage volume
565 ft 7 in 172.40 m 565 ft 7 in 172.40 m 0%
Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner
Cabin width
18 ft 0 in 5.49 m 18 ft 0 in 5.49 m +2%
Cabin height
8 ft 2 in 2.50 m 8 ft 2 in 2.50 m +14%
Cabin length
183 ft 9 in 56.00 m 183 ft 9 in 56.00 m +10%
Exterior length
206 ft 1 in 62.81 m 206 ft 1 in 62.81 m -6%
Tail height
55 ft 10 in 17.02 m 55 ft 10 in 17.02 m 0%
Fuselage diameter
18 ft 10 in 5.75 m 18 ft 10 in 5.75 m -3%
Wing span
197 ft 3 in 60.12 m 197 ft 3 in 60.12 m -7%
Baggage volume
565 ft 7 in 172.40 m 565 ft 7 in 172.40 m 0%

Weights

Airbus A350-900
Max payload
117,500 lb 53,500 kg 117,500 lb 53,500 kg -17%
Fuel capacity
37,196 gal 140,802 L 37,196 gal 140,802 L +11%
Max takeoff weight
624,000 lb 283,000 kg 624,000 lb 283,000 kg +9%
Max landing weight
456,500 lb 207,000 kg 456,500 lb 207,000 kg +7%
Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner
Max payload
141,000 lb 64,000 kg 141,000 lb 64,000 kg +20%
Fuel capacity
33,380 gal 126,357 L 33,380 gal 126,357 L -10%
Max takeoff weight
571,000 lb 259,000 kg 571,000 lb 259,000 kg -8%
Max landing weight
425,000 lb 193,000 kg 425,000 lb 193,000 kg -7%

Performance

Airbus A350-900
Max cruise speed
513 kt · 590 mph 950 km/h 513 kt 590 mph 950 km/h -1%
Max speed
513 kt · 590 mph 950 km/h 513 kt 590 mph 950 km/h -1%
Cruise speed
488 kt · 562 mph 904 km/h 488 kt 562 mph 904 km/h 0%
Approach speed
— — —
Rate of climb
— — —
Range
8,500 nm · 9,780 mi 15,740 km 8,500 nm 9,780 mi 15,740 km +2%
Service ceiling
43,100 ft 13,100 m 43,100 ft 13,100 m 0%
Takeoff distance
8,550 ft 2,600 m 8,550 ft 2,600 m -7%
Landing distance
6,550 ft 2,000 m 6,550 ft 2,000 m +32%
Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner
Max cruise speed
516 kt · 594 mph 956 km/h 516 kt 594 mph 956 km/h +1%
Max speed
516 kt · 594 mph 956 km/h 516 kt 594 mph 956 km/h +1%
Cruise speed
488 kt · 562 mph 904 km/h 488 kt 562 mph 904 km/h 0%
Approach speed
140 kt · 161 mph 259 km/h 140 kt 161 mph 259 km/h
Rate of climb
3,000 ft/min 15 m/s 3,000 ft/min 15 m/s
Range
8,300 nm · 9,550 mi 15,370 km 8,300 nm 9,550 mi 15,370 km -2%
Service ceiling
43,100 ft 13,100 m 43,100 ft 13,100 m 0%
Takeoff distance
9,200 ft 2,800 m 9,200 ft 2,800 m +8%
Landing distance
5,000 ft 1,520 m 5,000 ft 1,520 m -24%

Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner comparisons

No other comparisons yet.

Table of Contents

MeasureAirbus A350-900Boeing 787-9
RoleLong-haul twin-aisle airlinerLong-haul twin-aisle airliner
First flightJune 14, 2013September 17, 2013
Service entryJanuary 15, 2015, Qatar AirwaysAugust 9, 2014, Air New Zealand
Engine choiceOne: Rolls-Royce Trent XWBTwo: General Electric GEnx or Rolls-Royce Trent 1000
StructureLargely carbon-fiber-reinforced polymerOne-piece composite fuselage barrels
Economy seat width, nine acrossAbout 17.7 inches (45 cm)About 17.2 inches (43.7 cm)
Sources: Airbus, Boeing, Wikipedia, 2026. Dimensions, weights, range and speeds sit in the spec widget above.

How we compare the A350-900 and the 787-9

The A350 and the 787 are two families, and each has several lengths. We compare the A350-900 with the 787-9, the pair that airlines most often weigh against each other.

The spec widget above sets out the dimensions, weights, range and speeds. This page covers what it cannot: how they are built, how the cabins differ and who flies them.

Full specifications for the Airbus A350-900 and the Boeing 787-9 sit in our aircraft database.

They arrived within months of each other

The A350-900 first flew on June 14, 2013. The 787-9 first flew on September 17, 2013. Both are mostly composite long-haul twins, and both were built to replace older four-engine and three-engine aircraft on long routes.

Which is better, the A350-900 or the 787-9?

Neither wins everywhere. The A350-900 is the bigger aircraft, with a wider fuselage and a longer, wider wing, as the widget shows.

The 787-9 is the lighter aircraft. It stays closer to the A350 on range and speed than its size suggests.

So the answer depends on the route and the cabin. For passenger width, the A350. For a smaller, lighter twin with a choice of engines, the 787-9.

Where the A350-900 wins

Cabin width and seat comfort

The A350 is built around a nine-across economy cross-section, 3-3-3. Some airlines fit ten across, 3-4-3, on select aircraft.

In the same nine-across layout the A350 seat is about 17.7 inches (45 cm) wide, roughly half an inch wider than a 787 seat.

That half inch is the comparison most passengers feel. It is also why the A350 gets the comfort edge in most reviews.

A bigger aircraft

The A350-900 is longer, with a wider wingspan and a heavier maximum takeoff weight than the 787-9. The widget gives every figure.

It also has a single engine option, the Trent XWB-84, so every A350-900 shares one engine family.

Where the 787-9 wins

Engine choice

Airlines can order the 787-9 with General Electric GEnx or Rolls-Royce Trent 1000 engines. That lets a fleet match the engine type it already maintains.

A lighter airframe

The 787-9 has a lower maximum takeoff weight than the A350-900, and it needs a shorter takeoff run by the widget’s figures.

The 787 was the first production airliner with a fuselage of one-piece composite barrel sections instead of aluminum sheets joined by many fasteners.

It reached airlines first

The 787-9 entered service on August 9, 2014 with Air New Zealand. The A350-900 followed on January 15, 2015 with Qatar Airways.

Myth check: the A350 and the 787 are rivals on every route

They overlap, but they are not the same size. The A350-900 is the larger aircraft, and the A350 family stretches further up in size than the 787-9. Airlines often pick by route length and seat count, not by a rivalry between the two types.

Windows and cabin air

The 787 made passenger comfort part of its pitch. Its cabin windows measure 10.7 by 18.4 inches (27 by 47 cm), and its dimmable windows replace the plastic shade.

The 787 also holds a cabin pressure equivalent to 6,000 feet (1,830 m), against 8,000 feet (2,440 m) on older aircraft. Boeing says a joint study with Oklahoma State University found this improves passenger comfort.

The A350 started with conventional manual window shades. In 2020 Airbus announced electrochromic dimmable windows, like those on the 787, as an option.

So the 787 led on windows, and Airbus closed part of the gap. The A350 keeps its edge in seat width.

The families around each aircraft

Neither type is a single aircraft. The A350-900 has a longer sibling, the A350-1000, which entered service on February 24, 2018 with Qatar Airways.

The 787 family has three lengths: the 787-8, the 787-9 and the 787-10. The 787-9 sits in the middle, and the 787-8 was the first to fly, on December 15, 2009.

That is why the A350-900 and 787-9 are the usual pairing. They sit in the same middle of each family, even though the A350 family goes larger at the top.

Safety and teething problems

Both types have had early problems. The FAA grounded every 787 in January 2013 over its lithium-ion batteries, and cleared a revised battery design in April 2013.

The A350 has had no passenger or crew deaths. On January 2, 2024, a Japan Airlines A350-900 collided with a Japan Coast Guard Dash 8 after landing at Tokyo Haneda and was destroyed by fire. All 367 passengers and 12 crew on the A350 survived.

That accident is the A350’s one hull loss, and five people on the Coast Guard aircraft died. It was a runway collision, not a fault in the airliner.

Both families are young

The A350 entered service in January 2015, and the 787 in 2011 with the 787-8. Compared with the 747 or the 777, both have had less time to build a long safety record.

How to tell them apart from the outside

Start with the wing tips. The A350-900 has blended, curved wing tips, and the 787-9 has raked tips that sweep back in a straight line.

Next look at the nose. The A350 nose is derived from the A380, with a six-panel flight deck windscreen. The 787 has a smoother, more rounded nose.

Finally count the engine makers. If the engine is a Rolls-Royce Trent XWB, it is an A350. A 787 carries either GEnx or Trent 1000 engines, so the engine alone does not give it away.

Who flies them

The A350-900 entered service with Qatar Airways. Airlines in our photo database that fly it include Singapore Airlines, Turkish Airlines, Cathay Pacific, Finnair and Lufthansa.

The 787-9 started with Air New Zealand. Operators in the database include Virgin Atlantic, Japan Airlines, Air Canada, Etihad and American Airlines.

The lists are not complete. They only show which airlines appear in our photo galleries.

A350 vs 787: the verdict

Pick the A350-900 for the wider cabin and the bigger airframe. Pick the 787-9 for the lighter airframe and the engine choice.

Both are mostly composite long-haul twins that flew within months of each other. Passengers feel the cabin more than the spec sheet.

To see who flies the wider seats, see our ranking of the best economy class airlines.

FAQ

The A350 has a wider fuselage and a single engine option, the Rolls-Royce Trent XWB. The 787 is lighter and offers a choice of General Electric GEnx or Rolls-Royce Trent 1000 engines. Both are mostly composite long-haul twins.
The A350, by a small margin. In a nine-across economy layout its seat is about 17.7 inches (45 cm) wide, roughly half an inch wider than the 787’s.
The 787 family. The 787-9 entered service on August 9, 2014 with Air New Zealand, and the A350-900 followed on January 15, 2015 with Qatar Airways.
The A350-900. It is longer, has a wider wingspan and a higher maximum takeoff weight, as the spec widget on this page shows.
Partly. The 787-9 and the A350-900 overlap on many long routes, but the A350 family reaches larger sizes than the 787-9, so airlines often choose by route length and seat count.

About the Author

Tim de Vries

Tim is the owner and lead editor of AeroCorner since 2019, overseeing aviation content covering aircraft, airlines, airports, and the broader aviation industry. Through years of researching, writing, editing, and publishing aviation-focused content, he has developed extensive practical knowledge of commercial aviation and air travel. Based in Asia and a frequent traveler himself, Tim also brings firsthand passenger experience to AeroCorner’s coverage. Outside of publishing, he has also explored aviation firsthand through hands-on flight training in New Zealand.