Cessna 150 vs 152: What Actually Changed?

The Cessna 152 is a minor update of the 150. See what changed in engine, flaps and weight, and which one to fly, rent or buy.

Updated:

Add AeroCorner as a preferred source on Google
Cessna 150 and Cessna 152 compared side by side
Cessna 150 and Cessna 152 compared side by side – © Trevor Hannant / Rob Hodgkins / composite by AeroCorner

The Cessna 152 is a minor update of the Cessna 150, so the two fly almost alike. The 152 gets a Lycoming O-235 engine, a higher gross weight and less flap travel.

The 150 is the more common airplane, with 23,839 built against 7,584 for the 152. Pick on condition and engine time, not the model number.

Cessna 150
Private Single Engine
Cessna 150
Cessna 152
Private Single Engine
Cessna 152

General

Units
Cessna 150
Manufacturer
Cessna
ICAO code
C150
Produced
1958–1977
Price
$7,000 (1966)
Engine
1 × Continental O-200-A
Engine type
Piston
Power
100 hp · 75 kW -9% (total)
Wing tips
No winglets
Seats
2
Crew
1
Cessna 152
Manufacturer
Cessna
ICAO code
C152
Produced
1977–1985
Price
$25,000 (2007)
Engine
1 × Lycoming O-235-L2C
Engine type
Piston
Power
110 hp · 82 kW +10% (total)
Wing tips
No winglets
Seats
2
Crew
—

Dimensions

Cessna 150
Cabin width
3 ft 5 in 1.04 m 3 ft 5 in 1.04 m +3%
Cabin height
3 ft 5 in 1.04 m 3 ft 5 in 1.04 m -4%
Cabin length
10 ft 10 in 3.30 m 10 ft 10 in 3.30 m +39%
Exterior length
23 ft 11 in 7.29 m 23 ft 11 in 7.29 m -1%
Tail height
8 ft 6 in 2.59 m 8 ft 6 in 2.59 m 0%
Fuselage diameter
3 ft 7 in 1.10 m 3 ft 7 in 1.10 m 0%
Wing span
33 ft 2 in 10.11 m 33 ft 2 in 10.11 m 0%
Cessna 152
Cabin width
3 ft 4 in 1.01 m 3 ft 4 in 1.01 m -3%
Cabin height
3 ft 7 in 1.08 m 3 ft 7 in 1.08 m +4%
Cabin length
7 ft 10 in 2.38 m 7 ft 10 in 2.38 m -28%
Exterior length
24 ft 1 in 7.34 m 24 ft 1 in 7.34 m +1%
Tail height
8 ft 6 in 2.59 m 8 ft 6 in 2.59 m 0%
Fuselage diameter
3 ft 7 in 1.10 m 3 ft 7 in 1.10 m 0%
Wing span
33 ft 4 in 10.16 m 33 ft 4 in 10.16 m +0%

Weights

Cessna 150
Empty weight
1,122 lb 509 kg 1,122 lb 509 kg +4%
Max payload
500 lb 200 kg 500 lb 200 kg -19%
Fuel capacity
26 gal 98 L 26 gal 98 L 0%
Max takeoff weight
1,600 lb 750 kg 1,600 lb 750 kg -4%
Max landing weight
1,400 lb 650 kg 1,400 lb 650 kg -16%
Cessna 152
Empty weight
1,081 lb 490 kg 1,081 lb 490 kg -4%
Max payload
600 lb 250 kg 600 lb 250 kg +23%
Fuel capacity
26 gal 98 L 26 gal 98 L 0%
Max takeoff weight
1,650 lb 750 kg 1,650 lb 750 kg +4%
Max landing weight
1,650 lb 750 kg 1,650 lb 750 kg +19%

Performance

Cessna 150
Max cruise speed
109 kt · 125 mph 202 km/h 109 kt 125 mph 202 km/h -1%
Max speed
109 kt · 125 mph 202 km/h 109 kt 125 mph 202 km/h -1%
Cruise speed
82 kt · 94 mph 152 km/h 82 kt 94 mph 152 km/h -23%
Approach speed
42 kt · 48 mph 78 km/h 42 kt 48 mph 78 km/h -2%
Rate of climb
670 ft/min 3 m/s 670 ft/min 3 m/s -6%
Range
420 nm · 480 mi 780 km 420 nm 480 mi 780 km +1%
Service ceiling
14,000 ft 4,300 m 14,000 ft 4,300 m -5%
Takeoff distance
1,380 ft 420 m 1,380 ft 420 m +3%
Landing distance
1,080 ft 330 m 1,080 ft 330 m -10%
Cessna 152
Max cruise speed
110 kt · 127 mph 204 km/h 110 kt 127 mph 204 km/h +1%
Max speed
110 kt · 127 mph 204 km/h 110 kt 127 mph 204 km/h +1%
Cruise speed
107 kt · 123 mph 198 km/h 107 kt 123 mph 198 km/h +30%
Approach speed
43 kt · 49 mph 80 km/h 43 kt 49 mph 80 km/h +2%
Rate of climb
715 ft/min 4 m/s 715 ft/min 4 m/s +7%
Range
415 nm · 480 mi 770 km 415 nm 480 mi 770 km -1%
Service ceiling
14,700 ft 4,500 m 14,700 ft 4,500 m +5%
Takeoff distance
1,340 ft 410 m 1,340 ft 410 m -3%
Landing distance
1,200 ft 370 m 1,200 ft 370 m +11%

Table of Contents

Cessna 150Cessna 152
Number built23,839, including Reims-built F150s7,584, including Aerobats
First flightSeptember 12, 1957 (as the Model 142)Introduced in 1977 as a 1978 model
Engine lineageContinental O-200-A on American-built airplanesLycoming O-235-L2C, then O-235-N2C from 1983
Maximum flap travel40 degrees30 degrees
Aerobat versionA150K Aerobat, from the 1970 model yearA152 Aerobat, certified for +6 and -3 G
Replaced byThe Cessna 152 in 1977Nothing; Cessna stopped light aircraft in 1985
Sources: Wikipedia, Cessna 152 Pilot’s Operating Handbook. Dimensions, weights, speeds and range are in the specification panel above.

Which airplanes the panel compares

The panel above compares the standard Cessna 150 with the standard Cessna 152. Both also came as Aerobats, and Reims in France built F150 and F152 versions, some with different engines.

Cessna 150 vs 152: which is better?

Neither airplane is a clear winner, because the 152 is a minor modification of the 150. The 152 has the edge on engine life and gross weight. The 150 has the larger production run and a long record as the standard trainer.

If you are choosing between two airplanes, condition, engine hours and avionics matter more than the model number.

Where the Cessna 150 wins

The 150 is the original tricycle-gear trainer. It first flew on September 12, 1957, and production began in September 1958 at Wichita, Kansas. Its 23,839 airplanes make it the fifth most produced aircraft ever.

That huge fleet means parts, owner groups and instructors who know the type are everywhere. The 150 also gave Cessna room to refine it over nineteen model years, including a swept tail from 1966 and the Aerobat from 1970.

The 150 has larger flap travel, up to 40 degrees. That gives a steeper approach, which some pilots like for short fields.

Where the Cessna 152 wins

The 152 replaced the 150 in the summer of 1977. Cessna aimed for more useful load, less noise and better running on 100LL fuel, to compete with the Beechcraft Skipper and Piper Tomahawk.

The Lycoming O-235 has a longer time between overhauls than the Continental in the 150, so the 152 is cheaper to run over time. Gross weight rose from 1,600 pounds to 1,670 pounds.

Cessna also limited flap travel to 30 degrees for better climb with full flaps. In 1983 the engine changed to the O-235-N2C, with a new piston and combustion chamber to reduce lead fouling.

How they fly

The two fly almost alike. Both are high-wing, fixed-gear two-seaters with gentle stalls, which is why so many flight schools bought them.

The handbook for the 152 lists stall speeds between roughly 31 and 40 knots indicated with power off, depending on flaps and center of gravity. Neither airplane likes two adults, full fuel and a hot, high airport, so plan weight carefully.

Aerobat versions

Both types came as Aerobats. The A150K Aerobat arrived for the 1970 model year. The A152 Aerobat is certified for +6 and -3 G, with four-point harnesses, skylights and jettisonable doors.

Both Aerobats are stronger than the standard airplane and meant for training in basic maneuvers. Cessna built 315 A152s and Reims built 89 FA152s. Most pilots will never need one, but they exist if you want to learn basic aerobatics.

How the Cessna 150 changed over 19 years

Cessna labeled the 150 by model year, much like a car maker. The airplane stayed simple, but the details moved a lot.

The 1964 model added a cut-down rear fuselage with a wraparound Omni-Vision rear window. The 1966 model brought a tail fin swept back 35 degrees, wider doors, more baggage space and electrically operated flaps. It was also the biggest year of the run, with 3,067 built.

The 1967 model bowed the doors outward for about 3 inches more cabin width. The 1971 model swapped the flat steel gear legs for tubular ones, and the 1975 150M added a taller, narrower tail.

What the Cessna 152 changed

The 152 is a minor modification, so it looks nearly identical from the ramp. The changes are under the cowling and in the numbers.

Early 152s carried the O-235-L2C rated at 110 hp, which still suffered some lead fouling. From 1983 the O-235-N2C rated at 108 hp took over. The airframe is mostly 2024-T3 aluminum with glass-reinforced plastic wingtips and fairings.

The 152 also has single-slotted Fowler flaps that deploy electrically to 30 degrees. The nosewheel steers through the rudder pedals, which keeps it forgiving for students.

If you outgrow two seats, the next step is usually the four-seat Cessna 172. Our Cessna 152 vs 172 comparison covers that move.

Reims-built versions

Reims Aviation in France built both types under license. Reims built 1,764 Cessna 150s as the F150. In 1972 it introduced the FRA150L Aerobat with a 130-horsepower O-240-A, the first engine change for the type.

Reims also built 552 F152s and 89 FA152s. If you shop in Europe, expect to see these more often than American-built airplanes.

Modifications owners add

Hundreds of modifications exist for the 152. Owners add tailwheel conversions, STOL kits such as the Horton kit, flap gap seals, auto fuel approvals and auxiliary fuel tanks.

The Sparrow Hawk power package raises output to 125 hp, though it shortens the recommended time between overhauls from 2,400 to 2,000 hours. A 1996 certification also approved the 152 to run on 100% ethanol as an alternative to 100LL.

Who flew them

Flight schools and private owners are the core market for both types, and many airplanes are still in those hands today. Our list of the most produced aircraft of all time puts the 150 in the top five. The U.S. Air Force Academy flying team used three 150s, designated T-51A.

Military 152 operators have included the Bolivian Air Force, the Mexican Navy and the Argentine National Gendarmerie. The Bangladesh Army inducted five A152 Aerobats in 2019.

Which one should you buy or rent?

Pick the 152 if you want the newer engine design and the extra gross weight. Pick the 150 if you find a clean airplane with fresh engine time at a good price.

A pre-purchase inspection matters more than the label on the tail. Both are 40 to 67 years old, so each airplane’s history decides how good it is.

FAQ

For most pilots, yes. The 152 has the Lycoming O-235, which runs longer between overhauls, and a higher gross weight. The 150 is still a fine airplane, and the two fly almost alike.
The engine. The 150 uses a Continental O-200-A, and the 152 uses a Lycoming O-235. The 152 also cut maximum flap travel from 40 degrees to 30 degrees and raised gross weight from 1,600 pounds to 1,670 pounds.
The 150. A total of 23,839 were produced, making it the fifth most produced aircraft ever. Cessna built 7,584 Cessna 152s before production ended in 1985.
The 152 reaches a top speed of about 110 knots (127 mph) and cruises at about 107 knots (123 mph). The 150 tops out near 109 knots (125 mph), and its published economy cruise is slower. The speeds for both are in the specification panel above.
Both are two-seat trainers with gentle stalls and simple systems, which is why flight schools bought thousands of them. A tall or heavy pilot will notice the limited cabin and payload in either one. Fly both if you can before you buy.
The 152 has two seats and the 172 has four. The 172 carries more people and baggage, so students often move up to it after the private pilot certificate.

About the Author

Tim de Vries

Tim is the owner and lead editor of AeroCorner since 2019, overseeing aviation content covering aircraft, airlines, airports, and the broader aviation industry. Through years of researching, writing, editing, and publishing aviation-focused content, he has developed extensive practical knowledge of commercial aviation and air travel. Based in Asia and a frequent traveler himself, Tim also brings firsthand passenger experience to AeroCorner’s coverage. Outside of publishing, he has also explored aviation firsthand through hands-on flight training in New Zealand.