A220 vs A320: The Newer Jet Is Smaller, Wider-Seated and Far Less Common

The Airbus A220-300 and A320-200 compared: origin, cabin layout, seat width, assembly lines and sales. See which jet is bigger and which sells more.

Updated:

Add AeroCorner as a preferred source on Google
Airbus A220-300 and Airbus A320-200 compared side by side
Airbus A220-300 and Airbus A320-200 compared side by side – © composite by AeroCorner

The A320-200 is the larger, older and far more common jet. The A220-300 is a clean-sheet design with wider economy seats and a five-abreast cabin.

Airbus has sold more than 20,000 A320-family jets against about 1,100 A220s. The two cover different sizes, so they are partners in the Airbus range, not rivals.

Airbus A220-300
Mid Size Passenger Jets
Airbus A220-300
ICAO: BCS3 IATA: 223 Visit aircraft page
Airbus A320-200
Mid Size Passenger Jets
Airbus A320-200

General

Units
Airbus A220-300
Manufacturer
Airbus
ICAO code
BCS3
IATA code
223
Produced
2015–Onward
Price
$91.5 million (2018)
Engine
2 × Pratt & Whitney PW1500G
Engine type
Turbofan
Thrust
2 × 24,400 lbf · 109 kN -10% (total)
Avionics
Collins Aerospace Pro Line Fusion
Wing tips
Canted winglets
Seats
149
Crew
2
Airbus A320-200
Manufacturer
Airbus
ICAO code
A320
IATA code
—
Produced
1988–2021
Price
$101 million (2018)
Engine
2 × IAE V2500 or CFM International CFM56-5B
Engine type
Turbofan
Thrust
2 × 27,000 lbf · 120 kN +11% (total)
Avionics
Thales Avionics Suite
Wing tips
Blended tips
Seats
180 economy · 148 business
Crew
2

Dimensions

Airbus A220-300
Cabin width
10 ft 9 in 3.28 m 10 ft 9 in 3.28 m -11%
Cabin height
6 ft 11 in 2.11 m 6 ft 11 in 2.11 m -5%
Cabin length
90 ft 3 in 27.50 m 90 ft 3 in 27.50 m 0%
Exterior length
127 ft 0 in 38.70 m 127 ft 0 in 38.70 m +3%
Tail height
37 ft 9 in 11.50 m 37 ft 9 in 11.50 m -2%
Fuselage diameter
11 ft 6 in 3.50 m 11 ft 6 in 3.50 m -11%
Wing span
115 ft 2 in 35.10 m 115 ft 2 in 35.10 m -2%
Baggage volume
102 ft 0 in 31.10 m 102 ft 0 in 31.10 m -17%
Airbus A320-200
Cabin width
12 ft 2 in 3.70 m 12 ft 2 in 3.70 m +13%
Cabin height
7 ft 3 in 2.22 m 7 ft 3 in 2.22 m +5%
Cabin length
90 ft 3 in 27.51 m 90 ft 3 in 27.51 m +0%
Exterior length
123 ft 3 in 37.57 m 123 ft 3 in 37.57 m -3%
Tail height
38 ft 7 in 11.76 m 38 ft 7 in 11.76 m +2%
Fuselage diameter
13 ft 0 in 3.95 m 13 ft 0 in 3.95 m +13%
Wing span
117 ft 5 in 35.80 m 117 ft 5 in 35.80 m +2%
Baggage volume
122 ft 9 in 37.42 m 122 ft 9 in 37.42 m +20%

Weights

Airbus A220-300
Empty weight
81,750 lb 37,081 kg 81,750 lb 37,081 kg -13%
Max payload
41,300 lb 18,700 kg 41,300 lb 18,700 kg -6%
Fuel capacity
5,681 gal 21,505 L 5,681 gal 21,505 L -21%
Max takeoff weight
156,500 lb 71,000 kg 156,500 lb 71,000 kg -9%
Max landing weight
134,500 lb 61,000 kg 134,500 lb 61,000 kg -8%
Airbus A320-200
Empty weight
93,917 lb 42,600 kg 93,917 lb 42,600 kg +15%
Max payload
43,900 lb 19,900 kg 43,900 lb 19,900 kg +6%
Fuel capacity
7,185 gal 27,198 L 7,185 gal 27,198 L +26%
Max takeoff weight
172,000 lb 78,000 kg 172,000 lb 78,000 kg +10%
Max landing weight
145,500 lb 66,000 kg 145,500 lb 66,000 kg +8%

Performance

Airbus A220-300
Max cruise speed
470 kt · 541 mph 870 km/h 470 kt 541 mph 870 km/h 0%
Max speed
470 kt · 541 mph 870 km/h 470 kt 541 mph 870 km/h 0%
Cruise speed
447 kt · 514 mph 828 km/h 447 kt 514 mph 828 km/h 0%
Approach speed
140 kt · 161 mph 259 km/h 140 kt 161 mph 259 km/h +2%
Rate of climb
3,100 ft/min 16 m/s 3,100 ft/min 16 m/s +24%
Range
3,400 nm · 3,910 mi 6,300 km 3,400 nm 3,910 mi 6,300 km +3%
Service ceiling
41,000 ft 12,500 m 41,000 ft 12,500 m +5%
Takeoff distance
6,200 ft 1,890 m 6,200 ft 1,890 m -10%
Landing distance
4,950 ft 1,510 m 4,950 ft 1,510 m +1%
Airbus A320-200
Max cruise speed
470 kt · 541 mph 870 km/h 470 kt 541 mph 870 km/h 0%
Max speed
470 kt · 541 mph 870 km/h 470 kt 541 mph 870 km/h 0%
Cruise speed
447 kt · 514 mph 828 km/h 447 kt 514 mph 828 km/h 0%
Approach speed
137 kt · 158 mph 254 km/h 137 kt 158 mph 254 km/h -2%
Rate of climb
2,500 ft/min 13 m/s 2,500 ft/min 13 m/s -19%
Range
3,300 nm · 3,800 mi 6,110 km 3,300 nm 3,800 mi 6,110 km -3%
Service ceiling
39,100 ft 11,900 m 39,100 ft 11,900 m -5%
Takeoff distance
6,900 ft 2,100 m 6,900 ft 2,100 m +11%
Landing distance
4,900 ft 1,500 m 4,900 ft 1,500 m -1%

Airbus A220-300 comparisons

No other comparisons yet.

Table of Contents

The A220-300 and the A320-200 both wear the Airbus name, but they come from different companies and different decades. The A220 started as a Bombardier design, while the A320 is the jet that made Airbus a household name.

The short answer: the A320 is bigger and sells in far larger numbers, and the A220 is the newer, more comfortable small jet.

QuestionA220-300A320-200
OriginBombardier C Series, launched 2008Airbus design, launched in the 1980s
First flight16 September 2013 (CS100)22 February 1987
Entry into service14 December 2016 (A220-300, airBaltic)April 1988 (Air France)
Cabin layoutFive abreast, 2-3Six abreast, 3-3
Economy seat width18.5 inches (47 cm)Narrower, typically about 18 inches
Final assemblyMirabel, Canada, and Mobile, AlabamaToulouse, Hamburg, Tianjin and Mobile
Orders and deliveries1,105 ordered, 559 delivered20,598 ordered, 12,955 delivered (whole A320 family)
Newer versionNone yet; A221 stretch under studyA320neo, in service since 2016
Orders and deliveries as of October 2026. The A320 figure covers every A320-family model, not only the A320-200. Sources: Airbus, Wikipedia, 2026.

Where each jet came from

The A220 began as the Bombardier C Series, a program launched in 2008. The first CS100 flew from Mirabel, Quebec, on 16 September 2013.

Airbus became the majority partner in 2018 and renamed the jet the A220. It took a 75% stake in February 2020, with Investissement Québec holding the rest.

The A320 is an Airbus original. It first flew on 22 February 1987 and entered service with Air France in April 1988.

It was the first airliner with a digital fly-by-wire flight control system. That one decision shaped every Airbus cockpit since.

Size and cabin: five abreast against six

The A220-300 is the smaller jet. Airbus lists it at 120 to 160 passengers, against roughly 150 to 186 for the A320 family.

The bigger difference is the cabin layout. The A220 seats five abreast in a 2-3 pattern, so most passengers sit at a window or an aisle.

The A320 seats six abreast in a 3-3 layout, which leaves a middle seat in every row.

Economy seats on the A220 are 18.5 inches (47 cm) wide, and Airbus pitches the cabin with extra-large windows. That is why passengers often rate it above older narrow-bodies of similar size.

For the full numbers, the spec table above the article compares both jets side by side. This page sticks to what the table cannot show.

Engines and efficiency

The A220 uses Pratt & Whitney PW1500G geared turbofans. Airbus claims a 25% cut in fuel burn and CO2 per seat against previous-generation aircraft, helped by a structure that is 40% advanced materials.

The classic A320-200 flies with older IAE V2500 or CFM56 engines. Its modern answer is the A320neo, which entered service with Lufthansa on 25 January 2016 and offers up to 15% better fuel economy.

So the fair modern comparison is often the A220-300 against the A320neo, not the older A320-200. We list the A320-200 here because it is the most-built A320 and the one most passengers have flown.

Sales: a small program against a giant

The A320 family has 20,598 orders and 12,955 deliveries as of October 2026. It is one of the best-selling airliner families ever built.

The A220 has 1,105 orders and 559 deliveries on the same date. It is a respectable niche, not a challenger to the A320 for volume.

October 2026 shows the gap. Airbus booked 202 gross orders, 163 of them for the A320neo family, and none for the A220. Airbus delivered nine A220-300s and 54 A320-family jets that month.

For the wider picture, see our Boeing vs Airbus comparison.

Where they are built

Airbus assembles the A220 at three lines: two in Mirabel, Canada, and one in Mobile, Alabama. The Alabama line began deliveries in 2020.

A320-family final assembly takes place in Toulouse, Hamburg and Tianjin, plus Mobile, Alabama, since April 2016.

Who flies them, and why airlines choose each

The A220 launch customers were Swiss, which flew the CS100 from 15 July 2016, and airBaltic, which started the A220-300 on 14 December 2016.

Both are airlines that want a jet smaller than an A320 without the cost of a regional aircraft. That is the A220 sweet spot: routes with too few passengers to fill 180 seats.

The A320 family suits the opposite case. Low-cost carriers and network airlines use it on dense routes, where every extra row earns money.

The size gap shows up in real schedules. Swiss has swapped A220s for bigger A320neos on its Geneva to Heathrow route, as our news report covers.

Flight deck and crew

Both jets use fly-by-wire controls. The A320 was the first airliner to carry a digital system, and the A220 also flies by wire.

Pilots do not treat them as the same aircraft, though. The A220 has its own type rating, because it began life as a Bombardier design. A pilot moving between the two takes a type-rating course.

A220 against the other A320 sizes

The A320 is not the only member of its family. The A319 is smaller and the A321 is larger, and the A321 is where the family really pulls away from the A220.

Airbus is now studying a stretched A220, which it calls the A221. If it launches, it would push the A220 closer to the A320 in size.

Until then, the two jets overlap only at the top of the A220-300 range and the bottom of the A320 range.

The A220 vs A320 price question

Neither jet has a single price. Airlines negotiate large discounts, so list prices say little about what a carrier actually pays.

The spec table above shows the database prices for each aircraft. Treat them as a rough guide to the relative cost, not a quote.

Seat count matters as much as price. A bigger jet spreads its costs over more passengers on a full route, while a smaller one costs less to fly when seats would go empty.

That trade-off explains why both jets keep selling. Airbus can offer an airline the right size for the route instead of forcing one compromise.

Which one should you pick?

The verdict

Pick the A220-300 for cabin comfort on a thinner route. Pick the A320 family for capacity and the sheer size of its network. Airbus sells both because they fit different jobs.

Passengers will usually prefer the A220 cabin. Airlines pick the A320 family when they need more seats and the support network that 12,955 delivered jets bring.

The A220 may grow. Airbus is studying a stretch it now calls the A221, but no launch has been announced.

FAQ

No. The A220-300 is the smaller aircraft and sits below the A320 in Airbus’s range. Airbus lists the A220-300 at 120 to 160 passengers, while the A320 family covers roughly 150 to 186.
It was designed from scratch as a small single-aisle jet. It has a five-abreast 2-3 cabin, extra-large windows and economy seats 18.5 inches wide. Most passengers sit by a window or an aisle.
No. The two cover different sizes, and Airbus builds both. The A320neo family had 163 of the 202 gross orders Airbus booked in October 2026, while the A220 booked none.
Yes, since 2018. Airbus became the majority partner in the former Bombardier C Series that year and renamed it the A220.
The neo is the re-engined version of the A320. It entered service with Lufthansa on 25 January 2016 and offers up to 15% better fuel economy.
Airbus assembles it at three final assembly lines: two in Mirabel, Canada, and one in Mobile, Alabama.

About the Author

Tim de Vries

Tim is the owner and lead editor of AeroCorner since 2019, overseeing aviation content covering aircraft, airlines, airports, and the broader aviation industry. Through years of researching, writing, editing, and publishing aviation-focused content, he has developed extensive practical knowledge of commercial aviation and air travel. Based in Asia and a frequent traveler himself, Tim also brings firsthand passenger experience to AeroCorner’s coverage. Outside of publishing, he has also explored aviation firsthand through hands-on flight training in New Zealand.